The CARES Act and Governmental Means Testing

Perhaps it is time to reconsider the means testing principle in federal programs.  In simple terms, means testing is the practice of delivering federal financial support to those with incomes which are deemed inadequate to maintain a sustainable living.  When you are considering the basic requirements for living…food, shelter, health…means testing makes good sense.  If the purpose of a federal support program is sustainable living, then the benefits should be targeted towards those who lack the resources to achieve a sustainable life.  The simple Christian and moral principle of compassion supports this practice.  While our government can never, and should not try to, be all things to all people; it can certainly reach out to help those truly in need.

Over the last several decades, and in an increasing fashion, this principle has been somewhat distorted.  The driving force that governs the determination of exactly who receives the benefits has been broadened and arbitrarily defined in such a way as to direct these federal benefits to certain individuals who are not necessarily in legitimate need of help to achieve a sustainable life.  And as it is with all things, the misdirection of these federal resources to those who might be considered undeserving occurs at the expense of many who might actually be deserving and are not receiving those federal benefits. 

What I consider a good example of this principle is the new legislation (the CARES Act) recently passed by Congress and signed by the President to pump out economic support for those impacted by the coronavirus pandemic.  As I understand the law, each eligible individual will receive up to $1,200 each.  Parental couples will receive a total of $2,400 plus $500 for each dependent child.  Here is a short summary of the benefits: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/coronavirus-stimulus-check-calculator/  . 

The coronavirus episode is impacting most every American; but that impact is in such a variety of varying degrees that any attempt to address all of these effects is an impossible mission.  One size does not fit all.  It is therefore right and proper that we should all give Congress and the President a great deal of latitude in how they chiseled this monumental $2,000,000,000,000 (trillon) piece of legislation.  To put that number in perspective, let's say you've pulled an H.G. Wells and built a functional time machine. If you ordered it to take you one trillion seconds back in time, you'd get to hang out with mammoths and saber-toothed cats because one trillion seconds is the equivalent of 31,546 years.

With a package this big, it is really not surprising that a few things slipped through the process that were not exactly pertinent to coronavirus relief: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/03/big-government-contagion.php .  And although the Congressional Democrats were absolutely disgraceful is loading up this Act with extraneous features; the Republicans no doubt slipped a few in for their special interests.  At some point, all of those zeros following the dollar sign begin to lose their relevance to our legislators. 

Having engaged in their ritualistic give and take, all the folks involved in making this governmental sausage seemed to agree that a little bit (in the eyes of the beholder) of favoritism and waste in the bill was acceptable and the good in the bill far outweighed the bad.  In other words, notwithstanding that the legislation was passed to address one of the most serious emergency challenges ever faced by our nation, this piece of law was developed by conducting business as usual.  Not a real good look for our ruling class.  One would hope that they had retained some capacity to rise to the moment. 

Don’t miss the next post!

 Follow on Twitter @ centerlineright or Just Google centerlineright.

Circling back around to my first point; is the means testing in this Act really fair?    Consider a working couple with two kids who are busting their tails to maintain a good life for their family.  They have worked hard, climbed their way up the career ladder, and gained good jobs with good salaries.  They are not wealthy; but they have achieved a good standard of living through hard work and discipline.  They are pursuing and living the American dream.  Under the CARES Act, those working couples jointly making between $150,000 and $198,000 will have their benefits reduced incrementally down to zero.    

Now there is no doubt that this group of working families has been impacted greatly by the cornonavirus event.  They support this government with their taxes and support our economy with their spending practices.  And now, at this moment in time, when our government decides to help this nation cope with the adverse economic impact of this pandemic, they find themselves limited or excluded from the federal support financed by their own paychecks.  I agree that at some point of income or wealth, a family might be deemed not to be in need of federal support under the CARES Act.  But based on my own children’s lives and those others that I see in my community, this exemption level appears to be unfairly low.  Is it really fair to take a family where the father works construction making $95,000 annually, whose wife works as a nurse and annually earns $65,000, and reduce their benefits?  These are the very people who power the economic engine of America and they are the ones who pay the bills and keep the lights on in our nation.  Is it really fair to penalize them at the expense of those who might annually earn less each year; even including retired and non-working individuals? Is the overall adverse impact any greater on the lower income folks than it is on the ambitious folks who might have higher yearly incomes?  I don’t think so.  In fact, a strong argument could be made that the adverse impact is greater on the construction worker and his wife, the nurse.

As a nation, we must always be compassionate and generous in the way we address those among us with limited resources and essential needs that are not being addressed.  On the other hand, we should always bear in mind that the funding that finances that compassion and generosity is coming from hard working people who have achieved economic success based on sacrifice, hard work, and accountability.  We must be careful to confine our definition of those in need to those who are truly in need.  And before those who are truly in need become beneficiaries of federal funds flowing from taxpayer pockets; they must first be held accountable for the circumstances that lead to their plights.  Are they doing all they can to self sustain?  Do we reward some who might expend less effort to be successful at the expense of those who strive to prosper?  That is not the premise that this country was built on.

This aspect of the CARES Act is symptomatic of many federal programs that have tipped the scales of fairness towards those who game the system; thereby penalizing those who try to lead accountable lives as American citizens.  While remaining ever-conscious of those among us who suffer through no fault of their own; our government must constantly strive to provide a hand up to these folks instead of a hand out.  The support programs administered by our government not only serve as a critical component for those in true need; they also demonstrate the principles that should reflect the ideals of our founders.  Those are principles of self-sufficiency, load-sharing, sacrifice for the greater good, compassion for those truly in need…and most of all…the opportunity for all to achieve a life of quality and prosperity.  I fear that this important logic has been lost on our government. 

This nation’s greatness is based on the freedom of individuals to pursue and achieve good lives according to their own choosing and built upon their own efforts.  If we allow our concerns for government support to quash the recognition of accountability and disregard exactly who pays for this support, then our nation will lose its greatness and our populace will become a collective rather than a group of independent individuals.   While giving those in true need their necessary support, let’s be certain that we give the construction worker and his wife their fair share also.

The coronavirus will take many lives in America.  There will be great losses for family, friends, and loved ones.  Here is a tribute to those we have lost…and will lose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU1rZa8Ur_Q&list=RDIU1rZa8Ur_Q&index=1 .  In case you didn’t catch them all, here are the beautiful lyrics to this song:

https://www.lyrics.com/track/2846362/Jackson+Browne/For+a+Dancer . 

And now for a brief quarantine update….The weather in Kentucky is marvelous for late March.  The pastures are coming on and that is keeping the cattle off the hay for now.  It has been too wet to get any garden in; so there will be no peas this year.  The grass has been cut once, the lilacs are leaving out, there are some early blooms on fruit trees and Bradford Pear trees, snakes are crawling and I’ve pulled off at least a half dozen ticks so far.  It is a beautiful time of year to sit out on the front porch for coffee in the AM and a cool drink in the PM.  Deer are everywhere you look and the turkeys are finding their bugs in the grass.  If you have to stay home these days, around here it is a reward and not a punishment.  Thank the Lord for his magnificent creation.

It seems that a significant part of the small community of readers who frequent this blog have enjoyed the prior link to Manfred Mann and his Earth Band’s performance of Blinded by the Light.  Here is another great tune from that group who were clearly ahead of the curve in the music industry: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sJygu903kU&list=RD2sJygu903kU&start_radio=1 .

Self-Quarantined Tidbits from Rural America

As the United States and much of the world faces an unprecedented pandemic, people in America are dealing with extraordinary circumstances in extraordinary ways.  The bad news is that there is very real pain being realized by many due to the conronavirus spread.  The good news is that our nation is once again being reminded that life at its essence is a very fickle gift that flows to all of us in a benevolent fashion.  The Good Lord’s Will shall be done and occasionally, we must all be reminded of that fact.  Our part of the deal is to live with that fate in a manner that can be effective, responsible, and worthy of pride.   So as we all struggle with a new reality in our everyday lives, here are a few observations on the perspective from a small farm in Kentucky.

Necessity is the Mother of Invention.  Just as we have all previously experienced in our lives, extreme circumstances force us to realize capabilities that we never knew existed.  They make us perform in order to cope and then subsequently, reflect on that performance.  And as we reflect, we glean lessons that may be applied to the balance of our lives.  We make good, positive changes in the way we live because we discovered things about ourselves that we never knew existed.  We are tested.

The increased time spent together by families during this crisis will no doubt be a double-edged sword.  There will be some cases where the additional stress of increased time spent together will push already-fracturing relationships over the edge and result in permanent fissures.  But in most cases, increased time together will help to better cement families, help couples to actually learn more about each other, and will hopefully re-emphasize to everyone the critical importance of the nuclear family in our society and culture. 

Just as families and personal relationships will be further clarified by the distancing aspects of virus remedies, let us all hope that the governments that have so much impact on our private lives also learn from this adversity.  Even though it is part and parcel of my independent approach to politics, I do believe that the ill winds of this virus calamity have forced us all to appreciate that the government that affects us the most is the government that is closest to us.  Our mayors and governors have taken center stage in this epidemic by dealing with their local emergencies through the utilization of local actions.  The degree to which anti-coronavirus policies have been implemented is clearly a reaction to the degree the epidemic has impacted the local population.  As the virus spreads and hopefully soon reaches its peak, we can plainly see that the severity of the restrictions on commerce and personal liberties reflects a direct relationship to the severity of the illness in the area.  We are a nation of communities…be they rural or urban.

This highlights the strength of our government.  America is a collection of counties and states, with certain authorities in place to properly recognize that principle.  Our Congress and President work best when they recognize that principle and do their work within that context.  While some issues clearly lie within the federal jurisdiction and others are more expansive in nature; our national government is most efficient when it confines itself to those particular federal areas and creates a framework within which the states may autonomously flourish.  This particular national emergency has forced our federal government to embrace this fundamental concept and we can only hope that a strong remnant of that recognition remains once the virus emergency has passed.

Time for Reflection is an Opportunity for Reassessment.  My wife and I chuckle as we sit in our sunroom each morning and watch the media community continually address the self-quarantining of our nation.  There is some humor in even the direst situations.  The source of our amusement is the fact that before the coronavirus, we were already leading a life that was pretty much self-quarantined.  We are both retired and although we visit with our family on a regular basis, we are not active travelers and entertainers.  Our small circle of friends revolves around old, established relationships and our church family.  Since neither of us have public jobs, we seldom venture off the farm for much other than the occasional shopping or entertainment trip to a nearby town, a trip to the bank or grocery, or picking up farm supplies at the feed mill or lumber yard.  The internet has gifted us with social networking, streaming, and a wealth of information that requires nothing more than a keyboard and monitor.  Heck, just this morning we attended church online with live streaming.  I call it pajama church.

But while we may occupy the minor disruption end of the virus impact spectrum, we are very aware that many others are much closer to the other end.   This disruptive pause in the everyday hustle and bustle of American society brings with it a chance to closely examine where our values lie and where our priorities have migrated.  It is an opportunity to re-order the important things that we each hold dear and draw distinctions between necessary and optional,  authentic and superficial, enduring and transient, pertinent and extraneous, and most critically….important and not so important. 

The Cream Rises and the Dregs Become More Visible.  It is a shame that it takes a national emergency to create it, but it is reaffirming to see our opposing political forces come together in a time of need to deliver federal support where necessary.  Most Democrats in Congress have set aside their differences with President Trump and helped to negotiate the necessary federal support legislation that will address the adverse impact of the epidemic.  It is good to see New York and California Democratic governors work hand-in-hand with the President, both in practice and word, to meet the needs of the people they both jointly represent.  Upon closer examination, it is revealing to observe the language that many elected officials use when discussing these joint efforts and it is a pretty simple task to differentiate between those who are going through the motions and those who are sincerely seeking to serve.  And just as the transparently honest and sincere officials will rise to the occasion and reap the legitimate recognition for their unselfish leadership; so shall the shallow and self-serving rascals that continue to pursue personal agendas in the face of wide-spread misfortune be exposed as the despicable and self-serving people they truly are. 

In the positive vein, I’m talking about governors such as Cuomo of New York who has been as authentic an enemy of all things Trump as any Democrat in America.  Without considering the consequences to his personal political ambitions, he was conspicuously first among governors to openly support the President’s initiatives to combat this national emergency.  Even though it will be done so reluctantly and not without some acrimony; the Democratic leadership in Congress will also rise to this challenge and join with the President in addressing the nation’s needs with legislative and administrative remedies.

Unfortunately, there are many public officials and entities that will use their public office or forum to further their own ideological pursuits of private agendas.  I am talking here about our representatives in Congress who use privileged briefing information to initiate personal and beneficial financial transactions.   This is the worst kind of public office abuse and should be exposed for the travesty that it is.  It is also tragic that we continue to witness the ongoing devolution of journalism as exhibited by MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and many other members of the mainstream media.  Rather than utilizing their position of trust and influence to bring this nation together in a coordinated effort to cope with the silent and deadly conronavirus; they instead seize every opportunity to cast the President and his initiatives in a light that suggests incompetence, self-enrichment, or pure evil.  I would normally add self-aggrandization to this list, but the President is doing a good job of that on his own.

Don’t miss the next post!

 Follow on Twitter @ centerlineright or Just Google centerlineright.

Under the Cover of the Bright and Shiny Object.  It is fascinating to look beneath the headlines during this time of crisis and see some of the things that are transpiring without notice or acclaim.  Even though the coronavirus pandemic is a global phenomenon, that does not prevent many of the rogue nations on our planet from taking advantage of the pre-occupation many nations have in preserving their peoples’ welfare.  North Korea chooses this time to once again test-fire military missiles in a clearly provocative fashion.  Terrorist organizations and governments in the Middle East increase their activities to undermine any efforts towards the settlement of simmering conflicts and grudges.  One shudders to think about what Putin and his autocratic Russian rule is dwelling on these days.  And the largest shame of all must fall on China and its pathetic efforts to not only cover-up its irresponsible and costly reaction to the initial release of the virus in Wuhan/Hubei Province, but to then propagate a disinformation campaign to blame others for its own malfeasance. 

Notable among these shameful attempts at subterfuge is the withdrawal of charges by the DOJ regarding the alleged Russian influence in the 2016 elections.  Anyone who was paying attention can recall how Robert Swan Mueller III triumphantly announced these indictments in the course of his Trump/Russia Investigation Farce.  He and his merry band of Democrat lawyers did their little end-zone dances in a choreographed drama with the mainstream media; celebrating what they claimed to be proof that the Trump campaign had coordinated with the Russian government to undermine the 2016 Presidential election.  And now, after repeatedly and desperately trying many other tricks to squirm their way out of these empty charges, they openly and publicly admit that there was no case to begin with.  Their indictments were nothing but window dressing from the beginning.  They are simply withdrawing the charges and taking down the tents; all under the cover of a national emergency.  Read about this sordid episode here: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/03/department-of-justice-dismisses-robert-mueller-charges-against-russian-businesses/ .  These ideologues do this stuff and then sweep it away in the dark of night…hoping that no one will notice.  They NEED TO BE noticed.

There is No Perfect Solution…No Silver Bullet.  You would have to look long and hard to find a harsher critic of government than myself.  But in times like these where our nation faces an unprecedented challenge, we must all be a bit more forgiving and understanding with our elected officials.

The adverse economic effects of the coronavirus episode will be realized by every single citizen in our country; but that effect will vary to infinitesimal degrees.  As I mentioned before, my wife and I lead a fairly sheltered life in normal times.  Our income is sourced from a modest pension, social security, and personal savings.  Our lifestyle is modest by any standard and we are likely among the least impacted by the virus epidemic.  Our children are members of families where both spouses are working; they have children at home and in school, and they are dealing with financial challenges such as mortgages.  They are heavily impacted by this ordeal.  When you consider the diversified financial situations of all Americans and then throw into the mix the multitude of small, large, and corporate business interests, it is mind-numbing to imagine the challenge of crafting an aid package that will address each and every person and entity in an equitable fashion.

This is the dilemma faced by the President and Congress.  There is no perfect plan.  There will be winners and there will be losers.  There will some who profit unduly and some whose needs are not fully met.  There will be differing philosophies in how much and in what manner to deliver the support and the making of that sausage will not be fun to watch.  The whole exercise will plainly appear as nothing less than a bidding war between the two national parties; with no regard whatsoever as to its impact on the federal debt or the federal deficit.  A national crisis always offers the opportunity for unlimited federal spending with no accountability.  But at the end of the day, there will be federal legislation to address the economic impact of this crisis and it will be a generous and sincere effort by all of our elected officials to support the people they represent.

This Too Shall Pass.  At the end of March, a global and national re-calibration will take place that will determine what the short-term impact of the coronavirus epidemic shall be.  Either the infection/mortality curves will be flattened and the emphasis will be shifted to a recovery plan…or…the crisis will continue to rise with energy and we will all brace for more severe remedies and death tolls.  But even though we cannot be confident about when the pandemic will end, we can know with certainty that it will end.  And that realization…the fact that we will all soon be looking backward with complete clarity regarding how we behaved as individuals, as Americans, as a country, and as a planetary species…that fact should remain ever-present in our minds.

History will record the costs that this misfortune wrought upon our nation.  The end of the current coronavirus epidemic will create new opportunities for many in the quest to recover that which we will have lost in the battle to persevere and to overcome this curse.  When this phoenix rises from the ashes, it will come in a rush…not a whisper.  Many will be honored by their efforts; as many will be shamed.  But the overall impression that will inevitably settle upon Americans will be the fact that once again, as a nation and as a people, we rose to meet the challenge and we continued in spite of it.  As costly and painful as it was in personal and economic terms, we will rapidly put the bad memories in the rear view mirror and get on with the effort to resume life abundant. 

Blurring the Lines and Mission Creep

Two events occurred this week that reflect a troubling trend in American government.  They are both symptomatic of the quest that individuals in positions of power and authority have for more power and authority.  One of the more common maneuvers for attaining that additional power and authority is to publicly blur the lines between one’s assigned authority and another’s authority in an attempt to gain a portion of that other person’s or entity’s power.  Another practice that is often applied in today’s governmental environment is the expansion of a well-defined mission into one of an expanded nature that might better reflect the personal agenda goals of the individuals conducting the mission. 

In the case of the former, I am speaking of the FISA Reform legislation that came out of the House this week.  The content of that legislation is presented here: https://www.lawfareblog.com/whats-hr-6172-houses-compromise-fisa-reform-bill .  I make no pretense to being an objective observer on this issue.  I have advocated repeatedly for the abolishment of the FISA entity due to its susceptibility regarding corruption and politics.  Because of the abuses that were uncovered in the fomenting of the Trump/Russia Collusion effort, there was a tension in the House between the two national parties when the recent subject of FISA reform came up on the schedule. 

The Republicans wanted to use the opportunity to emphasize the weaknesses of the system that were exploited by Democrats in the Obama DOJ to smear both candidate Trump and President Trump.  Plainly speaking, the Republicans wanted to expose the guilty parties of that travesty and hang their dirty laundry out for all to see.   The Democrats wanted to do all within their power (which is considerable due to their Majority status) to diminish the abuses that took place.  While not condoning the transgressions that had occurred, they attempted to leave room for rationalizing many of the improper actions that took place in order to lower the perception of severity.  Neither Party had the pure intent and focus that should have been present in a debate on a subject of national security and citizen liberties.  It is really quite surprising that the resulting legislation came out as benign as it is.  It appears neither party succeeded in fully accomplishing their selfish intent and that the bill reflects a true sense of bipartisanship.  Unfortunately, the bill does little to address the fundamental flaws of the FISA entity. 

The first flaw is the fact that even with the scotch tape reforms the bill contains, the subject that will be spied upon (be they foreign or domestic) under the FISA provisions has no real defense to the accusations that will lead the FISA court to approve that spying.  Just as candidate and President Trump had no advocate when the Obama DOJ requested to place him and his associates under surveillance; we will continue (with this reform) to have that same lack of fairness into the future proceedings before the FISA court (the new amicus provisions notwithstanding).  The opportunity for corrupt government officials with personal agendas will remain present in the FISA process and both national parties will inevitably be in a position to abuse the system.  Neither is sufficiently capable of eternally resisting that temptation. 

 

Another basic flaw in the FISA system is the intermingling of our justice and court systems with the realm of national security and intelligence.  Federal and FISA court judges do not have the background necessary to responsibly make surveillance decisions regarding mining and extrapolating the depths of national intelligence resources.  Blurring the lines between our justice arm of government and our foreign intelligence arm of government does not make any sense and will inevitably lead to both the hamstringing of operations and poor decisions or actions.  The system of justice that an American citizen should expect in this nation is not the same as that of a foreign national present in our country with evil intent.  The reforms that this bill makes in this area does nothing more that expand the concept of a globalized method that regards all people and their rights in the United States as world citizens.  It is a road fraught with peril and it weakens our national security.

The FISA entity is a political creation that had good intent but little foresight.  It is a dangerous weapon in the hands of individuals incapable of understanding that danger.   Federal Judges should focus on the law and the fair application of that law as promulgated by Congress and the President.  It is up to Congress to write the laws defining the reach and authority of our intelligence agencies.  Our elected representatives in Congress and the White House should stand accountable for both the successes and failures of those agencies. 

Don’t miss the next post!

 Follow on Twitter @ centerlineright or Just Google centerlineright.

Moving on to the next topic brings us to the recent House legislation that addresses the coronavirus pandemic in America.  Here is a summary of that action: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/13/congress-coronavirus-stimulus-package-deal-friday-128140 .  While it is a tribute to our elected officials both in the House and the Oval Office to have passed legislation to aid in our nation addressing such a severe national health threat; it is regrettable that this bill reflects another disturbing trend in how our government operates these days. 

A cursory reading of the legislation will demonstrate to any reasonable person that the Democratic Party in the House, led by Speaker Pelosi, sought to decorate the coronavirus aid package with many window dressings that had minor impact on that aid and were clearly part and parcel of their entitlement-driven political agenda.  Pelosi clearly understood that the President was anxious to get some Congressional action accomplished in reaction to this sweeping health concern.  In an election year, he no doubt was willing to give in to political demands in order to achieve quick results.  The opportunity was there for a trade-off victory.  Pelosi knew this and she got her pound, or two, of political flesh in the deal.

Both national parties are equally guilty of adding extraneous amendments and riders to legislation in an effort to further their personal agendas; this is nothing new.  They have both muddled up critical legislation with legislation having absolutely nothing to do with the original intent or purpose of the issue at hand.  Perhaps this is politics as usual in our government and is the accepted give and take of democracy.  But at some point, someone in a position of authority and influence should take a reckoning of the practice and conclude that it might be time to re-examine the wisdom of that direction. 

When national emergencies require immediate and targeted action by Congress and the President, we would like to think that our President, Senators, and Representatives are capable of temporarily putting aside their political concerns to serve the greater good.  A thoughtful examination of recent farm aid, weather-related disaster assistance, and now the coronavirus threat bills reveals that our faith and hope in those elected officials is ill-placed.  The good news about our government is that the system we employ guarantees the diversified interests of all parties involved and the majority opinion will eventually triumph.  The bad news about our government is that the system we employ guarantees the diversified interests of all parties involved and most times, those parties will employ every legislative trick in the book to achieve their preferred policies.  This method, more times than not, results in watered down solutions to serious problems, bloated expenditures contributing to an already shameful federal deficit, and half measures that accomplish little more than drops of water being showered on raging fires. 

Rahm Emanuel, a former White House Chief of Staff for Obama and Mayor of Chicago, said “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.  And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you could not do before”.  One would like to think that Emanuel was referring to the mighty spirit of the American people to rise above the devastation of tragedies and bond together to overcome even the greatest challenges.  Given his status as a career politician and his history in that arena, I think he was clearly referring to an attitude exhibited by our current national parties; the attitude that seizing the opportunity of mission creep in critical and emergency legislation to further political agendas is perfectly acceptable.  It seems that our long and wearisome search for statesmanship leadership in our nation’s capitol continues unabated.

Now in fairness, it should be pointed out that both pieces of legislation addressed in this post have yet to undergo deliberation by the Senate and gain the signature of the President.  Things may change there; but that is unlikely.  The scenario seems set for Senate passage of both bills in their current forms.

Our Politics are in a Bad Place

The sitting American President is a bloviating and arrogant egotist.  Whether through his conscious actions as our Chief Executive, a perfect storm of economic cycles that continues to confuse even the most accomplished economists, or a magical mystery cosmic tour that has spontaneously resulted in robust financial activity for our nation…Donald Trump is sitting pretty in regards to his re-election prospects.  Now it must be stated that the coronavirus maelstrom and the fickle winds of foreign policy may yet upset the Donald’s quest for an extended presidency; but he is certainly on smooth seas for the time being. 

President Donald Trump has actually done, or tried to do, what he campaigned on.  He deserves great credit for many of his accomplishments in both domestic and foreign policy arenas and America today is a far better country than it was when Trump took office.  The President’s actions have created wonderful opportunities for the American people to improve their lives and his foreign policy has restored respect for America across the globe.  As I have addressed in prior posts, it is breathtakingly shameless to witness the Republican Party’s love affair with a man who less than four years ago was considered a buffoonish interloper.  Everybody loves a winnah!

Watching the Democratic Party struggle with their presidential nomination process, while simultaneously coping with their chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome, has proven to be quite entertaining.  Up until the recent Super Tuesday primaries, the Democrats seemed to be living the sequel to the 2016 Republican presidential primary.  Just as the Republicans were desperate to somehow and some way deny their party’s nomination to Donald Trump; the Democrats are equally struggling with their quest for something to derail the Bernie Sanders express.  But as things stand today, the Democrats have apparently figured out a solution that the Republicans could never grasp.  They appear to have consolidated their party behind what certainly seems to be the Democratic establishment favorite son Joe Biden.  Just as there are future bumps in the road for the President; Biden may yet figure out a way to lose the nomination and be replaced by…who knows.  But as of this writing and in lieu of a very public mental breakdown or criminal indictment, it sure looks like we will be having a Donald Trump versus Joe Biden race for President in November.

And that, my friends…is very disappointing.  My personal views on the presidential primary processes of the national parties have been voiced here: http://centerlineright.blogspot.com/2016/08/question-for-our-national-parties-wtf.html .   Each of us who might be of adult age realizes all too well how times have changed.  Our society and culture have not just changed; they have changed at the speed of light.  While some processes best remain true to their original intent and content (i.e. our Constitution), other things by necessity need to adjust to the changing landscapes that influence them.  There can be little doubt that running for President in 2020 is a far different proposition than it was in 1972.  And yet the political parties have failed to make substantive changes to their primary contests to adequately address this evolution.  It is my humble opinion that as a result of these selection processes not being properly updated to reflect today’s political and social environment, the quality of our national party presidential candidates has been diluted.

While it is certainly cause for celebrating the fact that Barack Obama broke the color barrier for U.S. Presidents; it is equally certain that he came into the White House clearly unprepared for the job that lay ahead of him.  Obama was elected on the basis of Hope and Change; not on his resume.  That inexperience likely contributed in large part to his squandering of historical opportunities to accomplish momentous legislative goals.  His lackadaisical and idealistic approach to the management of government resulted in unprecedented corruption in some federal agencies.  And on the heels of that dubious presidential choice, the nation stepped up again and elected a television personality to be our nation’s Commander in Chief.  It is difficult to rationalize how one thing makes any more sense than the other. 

Politics is a strange brew.  It has never reliably led to the best person for the job being selected for the job.  It is an oxymoronic mix of personality, luck, science, money, influence, weather, world events, and karma; the percentage that each contributes to the whole remains undetermined.  Notwithstanding that sometimes the greatest leaders come from the unlikeliest places; it stands to reason that when someone is hired to do a job, it just makes good sense to hire someone who has exhibited some capacity to actually perform that job.  Our modern day primary system has largely diminished this tried and true axiom.  For various reasons, voters today seem to favor flash over substance, idealism over results, art over science, and promises over accomplishments.  Even though we might get lucky on occasion and come up with a winner using this set of values; most of the time it is going to bite us in the rear and we will get the government we deserve. 

President Trump’s incessant bragging and crude rhetoric has no place in the vocabulary of a U.S. President.  Whether he chooses to embrace it or not, he is the top representative of our nation and a role model for generations of citizens.  Through his words and actions, he largely establishes the political tone for this country.  And while he clearly cannot control the behavior of his critics and opponents; he most definitely controls how he reacts to those actions.  The presidential pulpit lends sufficient credence to those reactions as to make them even more prominent than the original actions that create them.  The American people want to embrace their President; they want to be proud of their President.  We should not be placed in a position to celebrate good policy outcomes while acknowledging serious character flaws in the architect of those policies.  While not demanding a saint in the White House; is it entirely unreasonable to expect a gentleman?  No one should expect a President to lie down and willingly accept false or irresponsible accusation; but there are other options compared to jumping down in the mud with the pigs.

As an alternative to Trump, what do the Democrats stand up for us?  They give us Joe Biden; a career politician who has little to show for a lifetime in government and someone who has clearly demonstrated lapses in judgment that should disqualify any presidential candidate.  I am sixty seven years old and a living, breathing example of how one’s mental and physical capacities can pale over the years due to the aging process.  For the Democratic Party to place Joe Biden under the microscopic lens of a presidential campaign against a flame-throwing candidate like Trump and in a viciously partisan environment like we currently have in America is nothing short of an invitation to disaster.  The potential for the very public and painful humiliation of Biden is very real.

Many people have wondered why it is that Obama has yet to publicly and enthusiastically endorse Biden.  I believe there are two main reasons for this.  First, Obama is sufficiently narcissistic to do all that he can to make certain that his endorsement is not attached to a loser.  Once Biden gets the nomination, if Biden gets the nomination, then we will see Obama embrace Biden as the second coming and the only alternative to the evil Trump.  Secondly, Obama realizes that there is only one big splash to get out of his Biden endorsement.  Why use that single bullet in the primary?  Again, if Biden is the nominee, Obama will use that endorsement at the best strategic moment to spur Biden’s campaign. 

Just be sure of this: If Biden is the nominee; the endorsement is coming.  If he acquires the nomination, look for the Biden campaign to begin loading up on the old hands from the Obama administration.  At the end of the day, if Joe Biden is elected President; he will be little more than a cardboard cutout of a Chief Executive with Obama and his ilk pulling the strings behind the scenes.  It will be the second coming of the One.  In the upcoming campaign, we will not be hearing the wild socialist talk that Biden has used to attract the liberal wing of his party during the primary process.  It will be a morphing to a supposedly moderate stance that will actually be Hope and Change, the sequel.  The Democrats and Biden would sell their souls for the chance to beat Trump; and in this case, there is someone standing there with their hand out holding a pen. And make no mistake about it…If Biden gets the nomination…With the backing of Obamaworld and massive cover from the mainstream media…he will be a formidable opponent. 

Don’t miss the next post!

 Follow on Twitter @ centerlineright or Just Google centerlineright.

The likely presidential campaign that we will be witnessing over the coming months will not bring honor to our nation’s democratic processes.  It will not be centered around noble ideals and substantive debates on policies that impact the daily lives of Americans.  It will not be covered by a journalistic community that exhibits high standards of ethics and professionalism.  It will not be contested on the moral high ground of what is best for the nation and its people. And sadly, the two candidates that are featured in the upcoming presidential contest will in no way reflect the best candidates that were available to their respective parties. 

I am not sufficiently intelligent to respond to the obvious question: If not them; then who?   I have hired a few subordinates in my lifetime and I did not always hit home runs.  But when it comes to selecting the President of the United States and considering the awesome power and influence that accompanies that high office, can’t we somehow come up with a better system that might yield better candidates?  Our Constitution was written with the understanding that our leaders would be like us…imperfect creatures.  The brilliance and wisdom of that document is evident when considering the firewalls that are built into our government in order to mitigate the detrimental effects of corruption, greed, and criminality in our leaders and elected officials.  But our nation should not have to persevere in spite of sorry leaders.  We should not have to accept Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades in the Oval Office in return for a balanced federal budget.  We should not have to accept Donald Trump’s fraternity behavior in his official duties as President in return for a robust national economy.  And we should not have as our only alternative to this Chief Egotist a man who often forgets the day of the week, the state he is in, or exactly what he is doing there in the first place. 

We get the government we deserve.  If we are going to get better, we are going to have to do better.   We as voters are going to have to take the time necessary to educate ourselves on the candidates and their resumes.  We are going to have to listen to their policy speeches and not their sound bites.  We are going to have to surf the net for their biographies and pass fair judgments on what they accomplished in their lives.   Until we do that, we will continue to be confronted by choices similar to what we will see this November.  Don’t you think that our country and our children deserve something better than the least of two evils?

Four Stories: Two Are Inspiring; Two Are Intriguing

Today’s post will feature a lot of links to professional writers; that is clearly to the readers’ benefit.  I urge you upfront to read each of the referenced articles; it’s good stuff.  They are well written and carefully considered.  As far as the selection of the topics is concerned; they are all very timely.  Two of them fall into the sports category; but their content takes them far beyond simple sports.  I’ve never been a talented athlete; but I have played and followed sports my entire life.  These are without a doubt two of the greatest sports stories I have ever witnessed.  Do not be put off by the age of these events; their significance is timeless.  The other two stories are pretty much the common fare you read on this blog; they involve politics and government.  But once again, they address issues of real concern for any thoughtful American citizen.  We must always remember that our government is for the people and by the people; not the other way around.  We have slackened the reins on that proposition over the last few decades and it is way past time to once again pull them taunt.

February 24, 1980 was a Sunday.  I recall getting up early that morning to watch something on television.  If my memory serves me well, I was padding around the house before anyone else had even gotten up; it was real early.  The event I got up to watch was the 1980 Olympic hockey game between the USA and Finland.  For many people, this game was anti-climatic coming as it did following the monumental upset of the Soviet hockey team by the USA team.  Incredibly, that game was not broadcast live, but was featured on a tape delayed basis.  Today, it would no doubt be in primetime; but back then we did not have hundreds of television broadcast venues.  As exciting as America’s upset of the Soviets was, the fact remained that the USA team had one more game to win in order to gain gold medal status.  That was the Sunday game. 

The format for Olympic hockey that year was round robin and had the Americans lost to Finland, the Soviets would have won the gold medal.  Given the seismic impact of the USA victory over the Soviets, it was easy to see how these kids might not be entirely prepared to win another game against a strong opponent.  They might have been in for a huge let-down.   After all, they had just pulled off one of the greatest sports upsets in history.  But the spirit of these wonderful athletes and their great coach Herb Brooks carried them through the Finland match to Olympic gold and glory.  In my lifetime, I have never seen a greater upset victory than that win over the Soviets.  It was literally boys against men.  It was, and remains, truly inspiring.  It came at a time in history where it was the perfect storm of global politics, international sports, and worldwide cultural interface.  Follow this great story with me…

First off, a good HBO documentary on the entire episode:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-K-mm8Bqik .

Another great video to help put this tremendous achievement in context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM7HCm8yGNk .

A good article about the recent anniversary of this epic event and a couple of great clips about it: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-miracle-40-years-later/ .

Many times, sports movies fail at recapturing the emotion and power of the events around which they evolve.  But in this case, Walt Disney’s Miracle does a tremendous job of transferring the 1980 Olympic hockey gold medal quest to film.  Even if you don’t like sports movies, you will find this one highly entertaining: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v64ofT1rGOw .

Next up, let’s switch gears to government.  To those few that occasionally haunt the pages of this blog; it is no surprise that I advocate for the termination of the FISA entity and deplore the growing power and abuse of and by our intelligence agencies.  This subject is on the minds of many in WDC these days and controlling legislation for these agencies and acts is coming up for reconsideration and renewal.  It is hard to overstate the critical importance that the outcome of these pending legislative actions will have on the future of our nation.  The writers I reference below are well-versed on these subjects and their words help to clarify this complex and pressing issue…

A rehash of my personal feelings about FISA and government intelligence gathering: http://centerlineright.blogspot.com/2019/12/from-fisa-to-obama-to-trump-to-where-we.html .

Here is a good summary on how and why the FBI was originally created: https://www.fbi.gov/history/brief-history .

This is why these subjects are so very timely: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/484150-congress-set-for-clash-over-surveillance-reforms .

And here are two very good articles on exactly what our Congress should do about this problem: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/fixing-the-fbi-and-cia

https://americanmind.org/essays/abolish-the-cia/ .

And how do you think a President should go about cleaning up such a den of corruption: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/calm-down-grenell-is-a-strong-choice/ .

Don’t miss the next post!

 Follow on Twitter @ centerlineright or Just Google centerlineright.

Returning to sports once again, I turn to what is perhaps the second greatest sporting event performance that I ever witnessed.  To a lot of folks in my native Kentucky, horse racing is at the pinnacle of the sports world.  Admittedly, it has had its share of controversies over the last decade with doping issues nationwide and horse mortality out west.  But it remains a truly great sport and the people who manage it appear to be taking significant steps towards addressing some of their problems.  If you have never been to a horse race, you need to put it on your bucket list.  One of the great experiences in life is having a bet on a horse when they turn for home, seeing your horse make a move for the lead, experiencing the rush of the crowd who all have common or competing interests, and feeling that all too rare euphoria of cashing in a winning ticket.  The gambling aspect aside, there are few more beautiful sites than Keeneland Race Course (https://www.keeneland.com/) in Lexington, Kentucky on a beautiful spring or fall day.  It is like a trip to a national park and the majesty and elegance of thoroughbred racehorses is literally beyond description.  If you have never been, you really should go. 

The greatest racehorse I ever saw in my lifetime was without a doubt Secretariat, a.k.a. Big Red.  Much like the great Seabiscuit (and that is another great movie), he captured the affection and imagination of the public in a way that was infectious.  But unlike his predecessor, Secretariat was a beautiful and awe-inspiring physical specimen whose appearance was simply breath-taking.  His stature was huge and his stride was unprecedented.  When he was competing, he was poetry in motion.  He arrived in horse racing at a time when the industry was in dire need of something rejuvenating; and boy, did he deliver.  His crushing victory in the Belmont Stakes left no doubt that he was the greatest of his kind.  In combination with his previous victories in the Kentucky Derby and Preakness, the win placed his name on that hallowed list of Triple Crown Winners and cemented his status as a legend.  Here is his story and a chance to relive one of the greatest sports events ever in his Belmont Stakes win…

Here is the Belmont Stakes victory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfCMtaNiMDM .

But you need to know exactly what preceded the Belmont Stakes to put it in proper context: https://www.al.com/sports/2018/06/watch_secretariat_win_the_1973_1.html .

And of course, there is always the story behind the scenes.  Walt Disney once again presents a great sports event on film that truly transcends the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKmuvjL2cVw .

The 2020 Presidential Election Campaign is upon us.  Soon, we will be unable to watch anything on television without the constant interruptions of political ads.  We will be so bombarded by the hypocritical messaging of modern day messiahs that we will plead for the first Tuesday in November to be over with and done.  Here are some notes on some of what we can expect in this silly season of national politics.

Many in the Democratic Party are feeling the Bern.  Whether or not he ends up as the 2020 Democratic nominee for President, there is no doubt that Bernie Sanders is now on the short list of those with a good chance to achieve it.  Just as the Republicans grappled with the advent of Trump in their nominee selection process; the Democrats are likewise grappling with the Sanders issue in their primary.  The upcoming Democratic nominating convention will be must-see TV for anyone remotely interested in politics.  And aside from the obligatory candidate selection and promotion for their own party, what might the Democrats have in store for President Trump in the coming campaign?  Let us consider the possibilities…

The Bernie train is rolling, but there may be chaos at the station: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/02/bernie-sanders-democrats-have-already-conceded-to-front-runner/

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/who-should-pick-a-partys-nominee-for-president/ .

A very interesting article from a Dane about how the liberal government in Denmark that is being promoted by Sanders is doing these days and how it might work in America: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0220/danes_reality_check.php3 .

And just how does taxation work in those Scandinavian countries: https://taxfoundation.org/how-scandinavian-countries-pay-their-government-spending/ .

Once their nominee is finally determined, the Democrats will no doubt initiate operation Moderation Transformation; which will be intended to morph their left-wing liberal positions into something somewhat more acceptable to American moderates: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/economy/fearful-of-losing-key-bargaining-role-unions-hope-sanders-medicare-for-all-will-leave-room-for-private-coverage .

Of course, we cannot discuss Presidential politics without mentioning the Russia factor: https://spectator.org/the-next-coup-against-trump-has-begun/

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/02/lookin-for-a-new-fool-2.php .