Anyone
who has ever lived on a farm understands the term half-ass repair. And even
though the meaning of the term is pretty evident; the analysis of the action is
far less clear. You see, the quality of a repair job has a direct
correlation to the quality of the performance that will be expected from that
which is being repaired. There will
be times when half-ass performance will be acceptable; which in turn will make
a half-ass repair totally
acceptable. On the other hand, if the
performance or function of the object being repaired must be at a level
significantly above that of half-ass; then it is critical that the standards of
the repair be increased accordingly.
These are common sense terms; the prevailing of pragmatism over
technicality.
For
instance, if I am repairing the brakes on my truck; there is absolutely no room
for half-ass repair. If I am traveling
down the road towing a 4-ton load of hay, top a hill and discover a school bus
full of kids stopped in front me…I have
to be able to stop when I push the brake pedal. If I will be traveling on the interstate in
that same truck with my wife and grandkids, I
need brakes that work. If the dog
has chewed a lamp cord in two and I have a 2-year old grandchild crawling
around the house; a half-ass splice and tape repair simply will not be
acceptable. On the other hand, if a tree
limb takes the fence down between the pasture and the woods, there’s no need to
run new strands of wire and set new posts; stout splicing with a steel post or
two will do just fine. There are many
times when grass-string or bracing wire will be sufficient to repair this or
that around farm. There are times when
you use a high dollar bolt and there are times when you can get by with an
imported bolt. These are things we learn
by experience.
This
principle of gauging the remedy to the problem can be applicable to many things
in life. It is not always necessary to
entirely blow up a personal relationship in order to maintain civility between
friends. However, wielding half-truths
when full honesty is called for is a perfect recipe for future disasters. It would seem that another area where the
irony inherent in this axiom resides comfortably is the political arena. Even though the body politic commonly takes
devious and Machiavellian turns; there is no doubt that the strategic
application of truth in proper doses is part of playing that particular game successfully.
A good trader doesn’t have to lie in order to be dishonest; you just
have to know the right questions to ask them.
They won’t give up any more than they have to. In many aspects of life, there is a delicate
balance between whole truth, partial truth, and no truth. There are, however, two precise arenas where
there is really no place for half-ass repairs or half-truth applications; they would
be one’s faith and our justice system.
Our
personal relationship with God is by its very nature one of complete honesty
and transparency between the partners.
When one side is omnipotent and omnipresent; there is realistically no
alternative to the approach taken by the other.
We might fool others about what we have done and why we have done it;
but there is no fooling our Lord when it comes to accountability.
And
when it comes to our justice system, the very foundations of our nation demand
that there be equal justice for all people.
The bedrock of our civilization, our society, and our culture is based
on equal worth, equal opportunity, and equal dignity. As recorded in the second paragraph of the
Declaration of Independence, the “…All
men are created equal…” truth that is held to be self-evident leaves
absolutely no room for half-way interpretations. Unfortunately, our country has been taking an
increasingly cavalier attitude towards the simple meaning of this phrase.
No
one can deny that to a very large extent, the amount of justice one might
receive in America has a great deal to do with the amount of money the accused
has available to spend on a lawyer. While
striving and struggling to maintain equal justice for all, the demands on our
justice system have taken it to a place where time is of the essence,
expediency oftentimes supersedes due process, and power and privilege can
override the obvious presence of guilt. To
a large extent, our justice system has been de-sensitized
to the ideals our nation was built upon.
While we can all rally behind those ideals
of the justice system that we take for granted; we must acknowledge the reality
that it is, in fact, an ideal and not
a functioning model of equal justice for all people.
Rogue
federal judges who are essentially appointed for life have been pushing the
limits of their authority more and more in efforts to exact the type of justice
in their courtrooms that conforms to their personal agendas. Their allegiance is not to the rule of law;
but rather to their own beliefs and inclinations. It has become somehow acceptable for
something that is perceived by many
to be a good thing to be achieved
through whatever means are necessary; up to and including subordinating
established rules of equal justice to a self-righteous moral code held by those
in position to enforce their rulings.
This is, in effect, half-ass
justice.
Just
as those half-ass repairs will get you in trouble down the road, costing more
to fix in the long run than it does to fix them right in the first place; so it
is with arbitrary application of law.
Even though our court system will eventually, through the appeals
process, sufficiently examine a ruling to ascertain its validity; that process
often takes years. And while the cases
are working their way up the byzantine court channels, the unfair consequences
of the original improper ruling is
wreaking its destructive consequences on innocent lives.
Don’t
miss the next post!
Follow on Twitter @
centerlineright or Just Google centerlineright.
A
good farmer knows when a half-ass repair is adequate and when it is not. If there is any doubt…you fix it right in the first place. When it comes to justice in our nation, there
is no place for half-ass repair. That goes
for our court systems from the counties to the Supreme Court of the United
States. It also goes for every single
agency and employee in our Department of Justice (DOJ). Good people understand the science of the half-ass approach. They know to stay away from it. Over the last several decades, we have had Democrats and Republicans placing a lot
of bad people in the DOJ; people who obviously do not understand this
science. Given the likelihood that some
of these bad people will occasionally be placed in positions of authority where
they can administer half-ass justice with impudence; the best approach is to
prevent the possibility in the first place.
Regarding
the DOJ, that prevention entails limiting the scope and authority of the
Department and its officials to no more than that which is absolutely
necessary to carry out their stated duties. We should not
trust their integrity. We should not rely on their judgment. We should not
give them broad latitude to use special authority in cases where it is deemed essential. Their authorities and activities should be
transparent, limited, and sufficient only to the extent of necessary
assignment. Most important of all….DOJ personnel should be held to strict accountability for their job
performance. We currently have a
half-ass Department of Justice. We have
had some half-ass people delivering half-ass justice. William Barr is trying to change that. Good Government is composed of decent folks who honor their pledge to serve the people of this nation with honesty and
integrity.
When
legislation leads to law, that law should be specific, clear, concise, and
written with an understanding that imperfect federal servants will be
administering it. When we place our
Courts in a position to legislate from the bench, to interpret exactly what a law means; we place our liberties in the
hands of unelected officials whose loyalties extend only to themselves and
their personal beliefs. Good laws start
with good debate, a heavy dose of restraint, thoughtful deliberation and language that leaves no doubt as to content
and intent. Good Courts start with judges who apply the laws as they are
written and appreciate their roles as arbiters of justice in that context. All of these elements must have at their core
the unqualified understanding of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
that is the fundamental right of every…single…American
citizen.