Sky Diving and Touchy-Feely. The New York primaries
are in the book, and the national party presidential primaries haven’t really
cleared up that much. Trump had a huge night, sweeping in 89 of the 95
Republican delegates on the table. On
the other hand, Clinton walks away from New York with 139 delegates compared to
Bernie’s 106; not as impressive as the media might lead you to believe. So…as we enter into the 90-day window for the
national party conventions, what is the state of play for our national
candidate selection process?
Trump
now sits with 845 delegates, needing 1,237 to win the nomination. Cruz has 559, Kasich has 147, and Rubio (who has put his campaign on hold) still
retains 171 delegates. As incredible as
it may seem when considering his rhetoric, it remains true that Kasich is
running fourth in a three-man race. The
biggest question to answer on the Republican side is whether or not Trump will
acquire 1,237 delegates prior to the
Republican convention in July. If he
does, drop the mike, the game is over, he is the nominee. On the other hand, if he fails to reach that
magic number, either by a handful of delegates or a few hundred, the question
is certainly open as to whether or not he will be the nominee. Political experts (there are so, so many) are all over the board about Trump’s
chances to reach 1,237 and not only do you have to consider their factual
arguments about the math; you have to consider their agenda also. At this juncture in this campaign, I do
believe that every single political pundit has some type of bias factored into
their journalistic product. Some hide it
better than others, but the presence of that prejudice seeps into their
observations and prognostications and the only way to account for it is to read
a broad sweep of varying opinions.
After reading my broad sweep, I must confess that I simply don’t know
what Trump’s chances are of winning the nomination. I honestly think that his prospect of
reaching 1,237 prior to the convention is 45% for and 55% against. That is obviously a close call and can easily
break either way. Given the chaotic
nature of this Republican primary season, one would be foolish to ignore the
likelihood that there are a few non-anticipated surprises lying in the weeds. The prevailing notion appears to be that if
Trump fails to win the nomination on the first ballot at the convention, then
he will not be the nominee; the
thinking is that he will begin to bleed delegates on the second ballot. It is fair to surmise therefore that the best
opportunity for Cruz to seize the nomination will be the second ballot; during
which he can commandeer some wayward Trump delegates, gain the allegiance of
released delegates who are no longer bound after the first ballot, and maybe
make a deal with Kasich or Rubio to consolidate their numbers. Now if we get through two ballots at the
Republican convention and there is no nominee who has reached the 1,237 mark,
then we are truly through the looking glass.
History be damned; there is no precedent for what will then occur. Neither Trump nor Cruz has many supporters in
the RNC power structure and both have many political enemies. The common theory is that a parachute candidate will be dropped in
and will end up being the one that can pull together a sufficient number of
delegates to win the nomination on the third, fourth, or subsequent ballot. The RNC Convention Rules Committee will soon
decide whether that parachute candidate (if
such a thing occurs) must be one of the original 17 Republican nominee
candidates or if it can be someone from out of left field. Now even though this has been a campaign
season bordering on the bizarre, it is difficult to imagine a parachute candidate from outside the
original primary pool. A maneuver such
as this will be difficult at best; to expand the selection beyond the original
candidates would make it nearly unpalatable for many. So…as we sit here today, my guess is that
the Republican candidate will be Trump, Cruz, or one of the other 15 original
primary candidates. How’s that for
caution? No, really…all of those options
seem to be on the table at this time and it would be foolish to dismiss any of
them out of hand.
Clinton
continues to lead Sanders in the Democratic primary; but her margin of lead is
a very deceptive number. Based on the
number of delegates she has won, her lead is only 1,428 to 1,151. But when you add in the Democratic super delegates, her lead expands to
1,930 to 1,189. The Democratic candidate
must reach a delegate count of 2,382 in order to win the nomination. Clinton is closing in on that number and the
odds are very good that she will reach it well before the Philadelphia
Democratic convention on July 25. Now
lest we get too upset with the Democrats for having these super delegates who
are nothing more than transparent power brokers; we must realize that the
Republicans do the same thing in states where delegates are not bound by
state-wide voting. I really have no
problem with this on either side; the party should select the candidate that
best represents their philosophy and has the best chance to prevail in
November. Neither party (nor the media) has any grounds to
criticize the other as to how they select their nominee. If the respective parties can pick their
candidate without blowing up their house, then they have accomplished their
mission. Now, back to Clinton… I find the most interesting aspect of the
current Democratic race to be the lack of enthusiasm for Clinton and the
hyper-sensitivity she is showing in regards to Bernie’s increasingly harsh
criticisms. For all of her power and
political assets, Clinton has still not achieved anything close to a public
personality. I honestly believe that at
most of her events, you could simply put up a cardboard cutout of her and play
a taped message; no one would notice that she is not there. However, having
said that, the Republicans are fools to believe that her dry persona and her
cloud of legal/ethical issues will make her a weak candidate; they make her vulnerable
but not weak. If she is not indicted, she will be a formidable candidate in the
general election and stands a very good chance of being our next
President. But first, she must dispatch
Bernie and his troublesome antics that are pulling her ever more leftward. I’ve always thought that Clinton was much
more of a true liberal than she is portrayed to be and that she never really
bought into her husband’s pragmatic approach to governing. I hope I am mistaken, but I truly suspect that
if she becomes President, she may well bring in a Democrat Senate with her. If so, she will have an unprecedented opportunity
to stack the Supreme Court with liberal members who will help her to accelerate
and basically complete the changing of our nation to a European model of socialism-light.
It is becoming increasingly clear that Bernie
will not go quietly into the night and that Clinton will have to do more than simply
throw shade in his direction to end this contest. Whether or not she manages to win her primary contest
in a fashion that is perceived to be gracious
will go a long ways towards keeping her party united and improving her chances
of winning in November.
The
media is full of stories about primary campaign anarchy; mostly in the
Republican ranks. The fact is that chaos
rules equally in both parties at this time.
But the larger truth is that once nominees are selected by both parties
in July, there will be over three months for a lively debate about who can best
lead this nation. The length of the national
campaign will be another interesting twist to this year’s Presidential election.
The typical national Presidential campaigns
of the past have been about twice as long as this one is shaping up to be; with
the candidates more times than not already selected by this time and the conventions
simply being coronation ceremonies. This
time around, it will be a much more intense and compressed contest; so much money
to spend and so little time to spend it. It may end up being half as long, but it will likely
feel like it is twice as long. This will no doubt be a very interesting
contest; but first…we have to get
down to two.
No comments:
Post a Comment