Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Informative Timeline of the Mueller Investigation


After nearly two years and $25-$30 million of taxpayer’s funds spent, what is the result of the Mueller Report?


And with essentially unlimited funding, boundless resources, and little or no accountability, what were the investigative techniques employed by Mueller and his Team?  With no actual crimes discovered within the scope of the Investigation, how many lives were ruined and how much damage was wrought based on legal process technicalities that DID NOT REQUIRE a Special Counsel in the first place? 




After completing his investigation and compiling his report, Mueller delivered his Report to the Nation’s top law enforcement officer, Attorney General William Barr.  And in total compliance with existing law, the AG submitted the following Report Summary to Congress.


And to make common sense out of this whole circus, there is no one better to listen to than the one, the only, Andrew McCarthy.


And what about the people who placed their own personal opinions above the legitimate votes of individual Americans; subverting the government against private citizens?  Those who chose to abuse their power and position in an attempt to influence the public opinion against first a Presidential Candidate, and then a sitting President, with whom they disagreed politically?  Public servants in positions of trust and authority who joined together in an unethical, improper, devious, and quite possibly illegal charade to compromise a duly elected President of the United States?  Despicable characters who did this knowing full well that the basis for their actions was scandalous, unverified rumor, and whole cloth lies?  All of them doing this with the full knowledge that their actions would cripple this nation’s government, diminish the reputation and integrity of the agencies that employed them, and would ultimately divide this country’s people in a poisonous environment of political animosity?  Who are these people?    People like Ben Rhodes, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, John Brennan, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Samantha Power, James Clapper, James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, Susan Rice, James Baker, the Democratic National Committee, the Hillary Clinton for President Campaign, and the Mainstream Media.  These are People and Organizations that occupied some of the highest offices in our government and culture; most of which were either officially, or unofficially, associated with President Barack Obama’s Administration.  And who will hold them to account for their actions?  As tempting as it is, we DO NOT need another Special Counsel.  Maybe these two guys…



We cannot count on Congress to name the guilty; they are not capable of a task that complex.  We cannot count on the media to unravel the conspiracy; they were part of it.   The Attorney General will not be able to make sense of it all; he will be consumed by an attempt to restore respect and integrity to the Department of Justice.  It falls to Huber and Horowitz to pull the sheets back on this tragic subversion of power and abandonment of principle.  Karma can be an unmerciful and unforgiving entity.  And if it is out there, somewhere, waiting to cycle back around to deliver justice to the perpetrators of this tragedy, then the chorus sang by the late and great Freddie Mercury says it all….


Don’t miss the next post!
Follow on Twitter @centerlineright.



Friday, March 22, 2019

And Now...Coming to the Plate...

Now that the Mueller Report is out and has apparently whiffed, it will be impossible to tamp down the President for at least the next month.  And honestly...who could blame him?  For expert assessment of Mueller, see this: https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/trump-russia-investigation-mueller-report-full-disclosure-documents-testimony/    But a more important thing to keep in mind is something I addressed in a 12/27/2017 blog, repeated below.  The Special Counsel circus has closed down and the tents will fold up, but what about all the crooks that fleeced the good town folk with their lies, deceit, and tall tales of conspiracy and high crime?  Well, Mr. Horowitz has been investigating them for well over a year now and you have to think that they might be losing some sleep right about now.  The ONLY way to insure that an abuse of power like this never occurs again is to hold those responsible to account for their actions.  Mr. Horowitz...it is your turn to step into the batter's box.

From December of 2017.......

Michael E. Horowitz.  He is the Inspector General for the Department of Justice.  He is turning over a bunch of rocks and actually telling the truth about what lies beneath.  You can read about Mr. Horowitz and check out his job and background here @ https://oig.justice.gov/about/meet-ig.htm.

Here’s the deal: Mr. Horowitz doesn’t seem to care that he came into his current position under the Obama Administration, he seems to take his appointment duties and mission seriously, he has an impressive skill set suited to the investigation of government abuse, and he has an impressive body of resources with which to investigate said government abuse.  From all indications, Mr. Horowitz may prove to be the truth-teller that Mr. Mueller and his merry band of partisan Democrats was supposedly intended to be. 

         *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *

On a passing note, there have been quite a few quotes attributed to retired Obama Administration officials over the last few weeks; most of them reflective of their sophomoric, narcissistic, and naïve attitudes about this country and the world.  Do you ever wonder where ex-Administration officials go when they are turned out of office?  Why can’t they just…go away?  Not sure if it is valid (probably not, but you never really know with this bunch…), but here’s a story that is making the rounds and was supposedly overheard during a recent power lunch in WDC…

Ben Rhodes: Hey….Strzok has come up with a great idea for a new type of umbrella.  He ran across this old military research project that was discontinued.  Maybe we can all form a Partnership and make some money off this thing?

Andrew McCabe: I could check with McCauliffe if we need some startup funding?

John Brennan: Exactly what is this great new idea and has it been cleared through intelligence and military channels?   You know, I could help with that…

Loretta Lynch: If not, I can take care of that with them between flights.  Both our planes will be together on the tarmac for a few minutes somewhere and I’ll just pop over to talk about “golf and the grandkids”.

Sally Yates: You know…I have always harbored a secret ambition to appear on the Home Shopping Network.  This might be just the right time.  What color do you all think I look best in?

Rhodes: Here is the deal…this umbrella looks just like an ordinary umbrella except that it has three big holes in it so…voila’…you can look up to see the sun and tell when it stops raining!

James Clapper: My Gosh…that is freaking brilliant!  I will get a team on research and make sure there is no existing patent.  If there is, it will be gone by next week.  It…never…happened.

James Comey: I have a great idea.  We could put inscriptions on each umbrella; something motivational and uplifting.  Maybe we can kinda print it around the holes.

Lois Lerner: Let me handle the finances.  I see great possibilities here for a favorable tax situation.

Eric Holder: Look folks, I have some concern about the product liability possibilities in this deal.  Has anyone considered that?

Hillary Clinton (via teleconference from Chappasdljojererer…): Hey…just leave the legal issues to me.  NOT a problem.

Rod Rosenstein:  Wait a minute, you guys.  If there are holes in the umbrella, won’t that let the rain come through and make it rather useless?

Comey: I don’t see a problem; you can still read the inscriptions.  Maybe we could even make them in a fluorescent color….

Rhodes: Listen…we can line up some product trial research.  I’ve got some old frat buddies that can take care of it.  We’ll throw in a few kegs and they will tell us anything we want.

Susan Rice: The holes are not a problem.  I can arrange some Sunday Morning talk show appearances with the networks to explain how the benefits far outweigh the shortcomings and make this sound like the greatest thing since sliced bread.

James Baker: You know…this is the kind of thing that would benefit greatly from a strategic leak or two to the media; you know…just to tease it a bit.

Rhodes: One last thing.  Who will we pick to be the face of this product; the one with the big personality for all the billboards and ads; someone with a bright smile that won’t question the realities of the situation?  Somebody who would actually believe that this thing could work?  You know what I mean…Someone who is believable even though what they say is totally ridiculous?

All Together as One:  Our old Boss…Barack!!!

 Don’t miss the next post!  Follow on Twitter @centerlineright.  If you enjoy the blog, pass it on to your friends.





Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Put…Down…the Shovel


There are three areas of life where self-awareness is critical.  One is physical in nature; one is financial in nature; and one is rhetorical in nature.  Self-awareness is a gift that varies widely in the amount, and type, possessed by different people.  Typically, when a person possesses a high degree of self-awareness in a single area, they tend to be highly developed in the other two.  On the other hand, there are occasions where an individual might be adept in one or two of the three, while severely lacking in one or both of the others.  One thing is for certain: Those that are blessed with a high degree of self-awareness in any or all of the three are truly fortunate. 

The lack of self-awareness is many times mistaken for commonly held social vices, such as aloofness, sarcasm, lack of empathy, rudeness, arrogance, smart aleckness, or just downright crudeness.  Those unfortunate people, like me, who have chronically lacked in self-awareness their entire lives and have never seemed to overcome it, eventually come to grips with the fact that they will never be the suave, self-assured, and smooth operator that a high level of self-awareness creates.  In time, we learn to cope with our shortcoming by keeping our mouths shut, behaving in a reticent fashion, and simply being a stiff social companion.  Unfortunately, simply being aware of our shortcomings in this area is not always a fail-safe compensator for the pitfalls that lie in wait for the one who is oblivious to their own words and actions.

Having said all of this, I find a distinction between the old school self-awareness realities of my generation (Boomers) as compared to the new school attitudes of subsequent generations.  I will call this difference “learning to put the shovel down”.   For those among us who are less aware, we are all too familiar with that moment.  The one when we painfully, and most often awkwardly, realize that we have ventured into the danger zone where our ignorance has allowed us to commit, through word or deed, some type of grievous social mistake.   Although belatedly, the realization of the faux pas typically arrives before the mistake reaches disastrous levels.  It is at this point in time when we take action to, as the old saying goes, cut our losses.  We cease the ill-advised direction in which we were traveling and make a not quite elegant exit or modification to avoid total catastrophe.  In other words, instead of digging the hole so deep that we cannot reach the top and escape, we remedy the situation by putting the shovel down.  We climb out of the hole the best we can and move on to the next hurdle.  Our new generations have some difficulty realizing when to put the shovel down.

Don’t miss the next post!
Follow on Twitter @centerlineright.

In terms of self-awareness in the physical nature, the human instinct for self-preservation oftentimes kicks in and we alter our behavior in spite of ourselves.  Unfortunately, the instinct’s arrival is many times too late to save the day and the painful injuries owing to our poor judgment are incurred.  In a generational sense, this might be attributable in part to the practice of older generations allowing their offspring to learn by doing; which in shorthand reads realizing pain from screwing up and learning the hard way not to screw up again.  It seems that in today’s world of helicopter moms and snowplow parents, permitting our children to endure trials by fire is simply not socially acceptable.  They never fully realize the importance of putting the shovel down and their natural instincts for physical self-awareness never get the chance to adequately develop.

Now in terms of financial self-awareness, there is no human instinct for survival.  Harsh reality dictates that the rules of fundamental personal finance are things that must be learned.  That learning, either from parental, societal, or educational sources is clearly not taking place in today’s America.   No matter how pure they may be in heart and spirit, our Millennials and Gen Xers are lacking in good, old fashioned financial principles and work ethics.  The concepts of equity and time clock diligence are lost on them.  This is not a qualitative judgment; it is simply an observation.  I am implying that they do not appreciate the full value of ownership as it correlates to debt reduction and they do not grasp the concept of eight hours work for eight hours pay. 

The following article covers a situation that seems all too prevalent in today’s environment … https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2019/03/14/student-loan-debt-crushes-millennials-car-home-buying-american-dream/3103065002/.  At some point in time, an individual must consider the benefit of a particular college degree as opposed to the cost of that degree.  At some point, one must evaluate the true value of a community college education as opposed to that of a so-called prestigious university.  At some point, it perhaps makes sense to cease being a full-time student living totally on borrowed money as opposed to being a part-time student that is borrowing less and paying their way with some type of employment.  At some point, we must all make the judgment that only so much of our life remains to pay off the debt we are incurring and our true financial freedom only begins when that debt is satisfied. 

The rupture of the real estate bubble brought with it a huge amount of financial pain and agony to our culture.  When it happens, and it will happen, the bursting of the education bubble will bring a similar load of hurt.  The cloistered community of academia is fattening itself on the consumers of its culture and is perpetuating a vicious cycle of ever-spiraling inflation that is patently unsustainable.  Instead of addressing the symptoms of ballooning educational costs in America, we should instead be focusing on the root causes.  We need to take a hard and sober look at the pompous and arrogant attitudes that are feeding and sustaining the academic industry and all the privilege that goes with it.  Things such as the hyper faculty salaries, the inflated tuition costs, the burgeoning administrative components of universities, the literal reams of funds being wasted on nonsensical university research, and the inane counselor steering of high school graduates into degrees that have little or no return on investment.  We need to educate our high school students career-wise and emphasize to them that the time and money they choose to spend on further education must logically lead to a job that will justify those investments.  We need to help our kids understand that there is honor in many types of professions and a good, solid future can be obtained through skilled trades as well as college degrees.  Our children must understand that college degrees for the sake of degrees is a ruinous path that can ultimately lead to a deep, financial hole that might very well require a lifetime from which to recover. 

Fundamental skills of personal economics must be introduced into our elementary, secondary, and subsequent education levels.  We have an entire generation that has lost the ability to understand the basic concepts of equity, compound interest, cash flow, investments, debt management, retirement planning, and simple fundamental accounting.  Is it any wonder that given the general approach our nation takes to basic economics education, Congress and the Presidency govern as if there is absolutely no civic financial accountability?  We have all learned well how to dig the financial hole; but we have not yet learned when to put the shovel down.

And finally, there is the area of rhetorical self-awareness, which poses the greatest challenges of the three.  Communication in its simplest form is difficult at best and completely infuriating at its worst.  Most of us live a full lifetime without ever mastering the byzantine complexities of the spoken word and body language.  Adding to this maze of difficulty is the fact that we now live in a world of technological wonders that record much of our lives in either unforgiving audio or video.  The old escape route of reasonable denial is far more elusive than it once was.  The haunting specters of the past’s spoken words and deeds are now real threats poised to intrude on the present.  In a strange way, it seems this new accountability for our past records has led us to a detachment from any type of accountability for present deeds.  Does that sound incongruous?  Yes, I suppose it does.  But it does actually appear that more and more, our politicians and celebrities are in greater trouble for what they have said and done in the past than for what they are saying and doing in the present.  The past is more solidified; beyond the reach of massaging and changing and molding the circumstances that surrounded the original actions.  The context is established.  But the present?  Well, it seems perfectly acceptable that people can say one thing today, another thing tomorrow, and perhaps a third thing next week.  And even though they may all seem contradictory and inconsistent, the explanation that is forthcoming eventually will tie it all together in some type of bizarre and Machiavellian logic.  

The license for irresponsible remarks and lack of rhetorical self-awareness seems to be cheaper, broader, and more frequently used today than ever before.  There was a time when it was fairly true that a man’s/woman’s word was his/her bond; not so much anymore.  And the lack of that obligatory honesty and sincerity has brought us to a point where rhetoric has become simply a grouping of words in a time and place that may or may not be significant; possibly being explained away at some point in the future…whichever happens to be most expedient.  To put a finer point on it, when considering some of the fully self-aware individuals in today’s world, it is hard to tell if they are talking to us from inside the hole or outside the hole.

Perhaps the antidote to a chronic lack of self-awareness is the art of coming to peace with oneself; getting comfortable in our own skins.  Once we can manage to discover that if we strive to do the best we can do, and then learn to be content with the product of that behavior…that in and of itself can go a long ways towards minimizing the impact of poor self-awareness.  Maybe the key is to try and avoid picking the shovel up at all.




Wednesday, March 13, 2019

The Sober Socialist vs. the Chaotic Capitalist


Whether we are ready for it or not, the political campaign for the 2020 Presidential race is underway.  The Democratic Party is now laying plans for split debates in June or July to accommodate their field of candidates that is estimated to be between 15 and 20.  Not sure what the Republicans have in mind, but with a candidate like Trump…just put him up there and let him debate himself.

Unless Mueller drops a nuclear device in his imminent final report that obliterates Trump, it appears that our President will be standing for re-election.  That will leave the intrigue in the Republican Party centered around who will be the Republican Presidential candidate in 2024.  That will indeed be interesting.  If Trump is re-elected, don’t be surprised if sometime shortly after the mid-term elections in 2022, he replaces Vice-President Pence with the candidate of his choice.  As for the Democrats…if Trump defeats their eventual candidate in 2020, their Party is going to engage in a serious soul-searching episode to determine exactly what they stand for and want to promote.  In my humble opinion, a 2020 defeat for the Democratic Party in the Presidential Race is the best thing that can happen to it.  They have lost their agenda, their core principles, and have been splintered and commandeered by an extreme liberal segment of their party.  If they are going to fulfill their necessary role of being the alternate solution to the Republican Party, they need to once again find their place that has historically been located somewhere in the proximity of center left.  This country needs for that to happen.

But returning to the 2020 race for President, who would be the best Democratic candidate to represent the Democratic Party in opposition to the Republican Trump?  I submit at this early point in the campaign that the best choice for America would be Bernie Sanders.  Through all of the noise and near-hysteria that has surrounded AOL, the Green New Deal, and the other many radical left proposals and ideals being floated by the extreme liberal elements of the Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders has strategically held back in his endorsement of a full-throated shift towards socialist policies.  Don’t get me wrong; Bernie has always been and remains a socialist-oriented candidate.  But as bizarre as the term might sound, I classify Bernie as a Sober Socialist.  I believe his policies present socialist-leaning ideals in a uniquely American context.  Bernie doesn’t so much want to convert our nation to socialism as much as he wants to drastically shift our government philosophy to a very liberal and more social-centric stance.  Some might call me foolish for distinguishing such a fine line between extreme liberalism and authentic socialism; but I do believe that line does, and should, exist.  Within the parameters of our Constitution, there is room for a more liberal and socially-conscious approach to governing; that is what I think Bernie Sanders offers.  To me, Bernie stands out in this fashion from his opponents who have currently (or will have shortly) announced their status.  Biden is a Frankenstein hybrid of Clinton and Obama and has the substance of slime.  Harris, Booker, Warren, etc. are all creatures of the current political climate that promotes a say anything to anybody at any time and any place in order to promote one’s self.  They are all political creatures rising from political origins.  For all of his shortcomings, Bernie Sanders is faithful to a given set of liberal principles that he has faithfully adhered to for most of his political life.

On the other hand and in clear contrast to Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, as much as we have ever seen by a sitting President, offers dedication to the free market capitalist principles that have largely dominated our nation for its historically short existence.  Given his background as a wealthy real estate entrepreneur, this has come with little surprise.  What most people have found surprising is Trump’s dogged adherence to many conservative principles.  Many people (myself included) anticipated that much like his children, Trump was a Republican in label only and harbored a personal affection for many liberal tendencies.  Since assuming the Presidency, Trump has exhibited as much devotion to conservative principles as any Republican President I can recall since Reagan.  He is a mercurial man with a chameleon talent for shifting policy positions, but if he continues the governing principles pattern he has shown over the last two years, Donald Trump represents a clear leadership choice for conservative-leaning voters in this nation.  It is true that viewing him in this light requires one to separate the President’s personality from his performance and some might find that difficult at best and unacceptable at worst.  But if we are going to be pragmatic about how our government is run from a standpoint of efficiency and effectiveness, then the separation is necessary. 

Don’t miss the next post!  Follow on Twitter
@centerlineright.  If you enjoy the blog, pass it on to your friends.

Bottom line: I believe the Presidential election in our country should offer the voters a clear and realistic choice between two philosophies of how to govern.  And in addition to that clear choice, each philosophy should be grounded in principles that, even though they are clearly distinct from the alternative candidate’s, nonetheless retain a realistic possibility of implementation.  In other words, a voter should be able to look at two different ideals that could clearly be envisioned in practice and then proceed to make a choice for their preference.  Given the rising influence of the radical left in the Democratic Party, this Presidential election, more than any other recent Presidential election, should present a clear choice to the American voters between the principles of the left and the principles of the right. 

Divided government is an infuriating and maddening environment.  As we are witnessing now, the unbridled Democratic investigations in the House are nothing more than attempts to damage and hinder President Trump to the greatest extent possible.  This is not unlike what the Republican Senate did to Obama when he was flailing about the White House. 

As much as I disliked the policies of President George W. Bush, I have always liked his phrase compassionate conservatism.  Utilizing labels is a dangerous adventure and political labels in particular can trip emotional wires that lead to extreme rhetoric and reaction; but we must occasionally use labels to form some type of context for civil discussion.  And when we do so, we must all take into account that labels are generally broad and expansive descriptors that can be interpreted different ways by different people.  For this reason, the deceitful and irresponsible use of labels for partisan purposes is disingenuous at its best, absolutely disgraceful at its worst. 

Within the framework of the Constitution, our nation’s blueprint set forth by the founding fathers, there is plenty of room for civil discourse between those who promote conservatism and those who promote liberalism.  Compassionate conservatism, a minimalist approach to government finance and regulation with an appropriate concern for those among us with limited resources, is a valid position to assume.  Equally legitimate is a sober liberal agenda that considers a broader government reach, a greater emphasis on real social problems, and a discussion of tax equity among our vastly disparate income groups in America.  The key element to the co-existence of these two philosophies is the necessity for each side to engage in a respectful, sincere, and reasonable approach to negotiation and governing.  The winner take all attitudes that both national parties have exhibited over the last couple of decades have dramatically discredited the Republicans and the Democrats and have poorly served our government, our citizens, and the politicians themselves. 

I realize how naïve it sounds to make this statement, but a civil and meritorious debate between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump would be a great development for the United States.  The clearly defined policy ideals of each could establish a framework for a debate on America’s real problems and the possible solutions to those problems.  Keeping it real will obviously be the problem.



Friday, March 8, 2019

As the Boomers Fade, the Millennials Ascend

US population….(2019) 328 million.  How do YOU fit in the mix and how does that impact your future?    I am a Boomer and have two children; one a Millennial male and one a Gen X female.  Over the last few years, I am increasingly feeling the transition and evolution of one generation to the next as I interact not so much with my children, but with my grandchildren.  They, of course, are Gen Z.

Now I am admittedly conservative and old-school.  Growing up in rural Kentucky, I have always been and remain a product of country living and attitudes.  And up until a few years back, that fact never really occurred to me with any significance.  I raised my family and pursued my career.  I traveled a bit and interacted with folks from other parts of America; but never really on a very extensive level.  Perhaps it was a somewhat sheltered life, but it was a good life.  I have been truly blessed.  I grew up with folks like me and the wanderlust for globetrotting never really took hold. 

As I enter into the senior years of my life, I spend more time considering how diverse and stratified our population is; and the context of that consideration is not what it once was.  For most of my life, I thought about population diversification in terms of race, gender, income, etc.  These days, I think about the rich textures of our citizenry in terms of generations. 

https://knoema.com/egyydzc/us-population-by-age-and-generation

https://www.statista.com/statistics/296974/us-population-share-by-generation/

In 2019, the Millennials will pass by the Boomers and become the dominant (at least numerically) generation in America.

https://insight.factset.com/millennials-outnumber-baby-boomers-but-dont-count-them-out

And what does this say about our country?  First off, it says that I am increasingly out of touch with everyday culture and society and things don’t seem to make as much sense as they once did.  The music on the radio is not quite as appealing as it once was.  The entertainment content and plotting follows lines that are somewhat illogical to me.  And the advertising that I see coming from all directions…that is nothing but a ball of confusion.  It is simultaneously stunning, creative, offensive, frustrating, curious, mystifying, stupid, irrational, entertaining, brilliant and, on rare occasions, entertaining.  

I draw two conclusions from this media marketing blitz.  First, it is clearly the Millennials and the Gen Xers that are exercising the most influence with American marketing.  I can usually discern what my issues might be with the Gen Xers; the Millennials simply befuddle me.  I think this may be because the Gen Xers bookend my generation, while the Millennials are a generation apart.  Secondly, the groups of young professionals that are driving the marketing industry appear to live in socially-environmental bubbles and create their product more so for their peers than for the consuming public at large.  They appear to be far more interested in social consciousness, political correctness, and instructive living than they are in selling merchandise.  If you are like me, I wonder to myself after viewing most commercials….Why do they think THAT would make me want to buy their product?

Don’t miss the next post!  Follow on Twitter
@centerlineright.  If you enjoy the blog, pass it on to your friends.

It occurs to me that the reason for my dissonance is not necessarily the message, but the messenger.  They are not selling stuff to me; they are selling stuff to each other.  This observation, the fact that these newly predominant Millennials and Gen Xers tend to circulate in streams of like minds and like consciousness, might explain much.  It feeds the fact that we are a nation solidly divided in political terms.  As a young adult and maturing individual, I relied on the news as it was presented to me.  Certainly I was able to listen to, consider, and digest what I encountered in the way of broadcast news.  But my sources were limited and though the faces and personalities varied somewhat, the overall effect was rather monotonous.  The generations that have followed mine have been blessed with many more sources of information.  The internet offers a literally limitless supply of data and facts with which to feed and cultivate opinions.  

At first blush, one might think this would ultimately lead to a more enlightened and broader-thinking attitude; a more diversified and varied set of ideals and principles among our citizenry.  But it seems instead to have led us down a path that enables each of us to find the validation and confirmation for our own personal beliefs and philosophies with such ease that…we do just that, at the expense of entertaining differing beliefs and philosophies.  This tribal tendency has always existed with humans, but the shrinking global community has somehow accelerated its influence over our lives.  We all find comfort in being with like-minded friends and co-workers.  We are now equipped to choose from the endless menus of entertainment and academics those sources that buttress our personal agendas.  We fill the hours of our days with these sought after certifications that tend to make us far too certain of our own wisdom and correctness. 

My father’s world was not his father’s world.  My son’s world is not my world.   Generational change and evolution is inevitable.  I know this to be true and proper and yet still…I chaff at the reality of hard lessons learned and earned by my generation being so carelessly regarded by my children’s generation.  Every succeeding generation has its moments of triumph and failure; its glories and its shame.  Comparing one generation to another on a meritorious scale is an exercise in futility; rather like comparing athletes from different eras.  A fair comparison is impossible because the context is never the same.  I want so much for my children and grandchildren to be spared the pain and heartache of the hard lessons I learned in my life.  I want them to understand the preciousness of every moment and the unique joys that are liberally sprinkled throughout our lives.  But ultimately we will all face the fact that we each live in our own space and time.  We each occupy a particular place on this planet separated from all others by six degrees or so.  We exist for a while…then we are gone.  Just as I struggle with understanding the Millennials and the Gen Xers; so will they someday struggle with understanding their successors.  Such is the world and such is life. 

I am reminded of the old saying by philosopher George Santayana…"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."  It serves each of us, regardless of our generational identification, to study and preserve the lives and times of those that precede us in this world.  In our own ways, we need to honor their sacrifices made selflessly for those that came after.  We need to learn from their mistakes.  We need to draw conclusions from their episodes and trials.  We can honor their heritage and traditions while simultaneously creating our own.  We need to appreciate their contributions and, in turn, better understand that we too will be judged by those who come behind us.  There are limits to life lessons that can be taught; some must be lived to be learned.  We are all limited in our abilities to play professor for the future generations. 

I suppose there is an irony here that implies no matter how much we may care for those that follow us, the lessons we might teach have limited application.  Those lessons, after all, were from a different time and place and played out in an entirely different environment.  You can love your children in an unqualified fashion.  You can try and create a safe and nourishing home for them in which to grow and mature.  You can attempt to instill fundamental principles of justice, dignity, ethics, and honor in their character.  But at some point, we simply have to surrender them to their wings and understand that their sun is rising as our sun sets.

The Silent Generation: Born 1928-1945 (73-90 years old).

https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-silent-generation-definition-characteristics-facts.html

Baby Boomers: Born 1946-1964 (54-72 years old).  They number about 76.4 million, 25 percent of the population.  Millennials have just recently passed the Boomers numerically. According to Gallup, about a third of today's workforce comes from the 75 million-strong Baby Boom generation. The oldest Boomers turn 70 next year and the youngest are in their early 50s. More than 44 million of them are still working.

https://www.cnn.com/2013/11/06/us/baby-boomer-generation-fast-facts/index.html

https://www.prb.org/justhowmanybabyboomersarethere/

https://seniors.lovetoknow.com/Baby_Boomer_Statistics

Generation X: Born 1965-1980 (38-53 years old).

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2017/08/why-generation-x-might-be-our-last-best-hope

Millennials: Born 1981-1996 (22-37 years old).  A “Millennial” is a person reaching young adulthood around the year 2000.  There are about 84 million, 26 percent of the population.  Within the next two years, 50 percent of the U.S. workforce is expected to be made up of Millennials. It will be 75 percent by 2030, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/millennials-millennial-generation

Generation Z: Born 1995 and later.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-beall/8-key-differences-between_b_12814200.html



Friday, March 1, 2019

800 Pages Long and Tissue Paper Thin…and Other Things


Mueller is like the person who slams every cabinet door in the kitchen, clangs every pot and pan in the cabinets, empties out half the pantry, and leaves a colossal mess that will take two days to clean up….all for making a can of soup.  Mueller and his partisan team might just be feeling a bit inadequate these days; looking ahead to that inevitable day when a final report is due and it will be read.  If you are a player, pay attention to the odds and maybe get in on how long it will take for some of Andrew Weissmann’s work to get thrown out of court…again.  Read for yourself and be honest…does this sound like Trump/Russia Collusion?



The Big Upside to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and China Talks is the elephant that is not in the room; Russia.  Russia is the Obama of foreign nations.  It is so narcissistic that it cannot abide any international conversation taking place without its name being central to the discussion.  The only way that Russia remains relevant is that democracies in America and Western Europe continue to appease them, while simultaneously making them the global boogeyman.  Russia has been, and remains, a monstrous indictment of socialism and raw power dictatorship.  Its economy is a dismal failure and the people suffer from a combination of corrupt leaders, pathetic infrastructure and a third world standard of living.  Putin spends every moment of every waking hour obsessing with the ever illusive reclamation of the USSR glory days; that ship has sailed.  Trump has discovered that the best way to deal with Russia is to marginalize them; exposing them for the weak-kneed bully they are.  Their one shining moment is oil production and the good old USA has reclaimed that championship in the last few years.

However, one of the things that drives me nuts about Trump is the seemingly cavalier and forgiving attitude that he takes with world leaders who fall into the category of despicable and brutal; such as Putin and Jong Un.  The Donald seems to think he is such a talented dealmaker that he can schmooze his way into the good graces of despots and change their attitudes of America, freedom, and human dignity with a twinkle of his eye.  Donald…you ain’t that good and you wouldn’t be the first to try and fail at this futile exercise.  Call them what they are, recognize them for what they do, and never legitimize their crimes against humanity.


Don’t miss the next post!  Follow on Twitter
@centerlineright.  If you enjoy the blog, pass it on to your friends.

The Cohen Hearings in the House….what can you say?  While our President is in Hanoi trying to talk World Peace with one of the planet’s greatest threats to World Peace, House Democrats think it is wise to hold, on the same day, these hearings.  To make matters worse, said hearings are based solely on the delusional wonderings of an inept bagman, admitted liar, and publicity seeking rascal.  The only  thing sadder than the Democrats putting Cohen up on a pedestal for the whole world to watch is realizing that Donald Trump kept this guy around for ten years as his personal attorney.  By the way, I am taking bets on the exact time and place that Adam Schiff’s eyeballs actually pop out of his head.




Democratic Party behavior is becoming more abysmal by the day.  Three good and recent examples are linked below.  Flat out lies about the recent tax reform; blatant obstructionism in Congress; and playing fast and loose with the Constitution are the featured items in today’s post.  Democrats…please find an adult who will supervise your party.





And now, let’s move on to the rising Democratic Presidential Wannabes. Here are features on the two who are considered front runners for the Democratic Presidential Nominee.  Caveat Emptor.




Oh, and by the way, for the record…..I am a social Moderate; I am a foreign policy Libertarian; I am fiscally frugal; and I am a flyover country Conservative that does NOT want to be Bill Maher.

Summer Comes with a Serious Look on Its Face

June 21 will be the first day of summer and it is introducing itself in my part of the world with a string of 90 degree-plus days and a dry ...