The
U.S. Census Bureau says that Black or African American citizens constitute 13.4
percent of the American population. This
figure makes them the second largest minority population in our country
following the 18.5 percent figure representative of Hispanic or Latino
citizens. White citizens make up 76.3
percent of the population. What do these
numbers tell us and how should they be considered when we contemplate the laws,
regulations, and cultural habits that make up our society? Should they have any relevance regarding the
Black Lives Matter protests taking place all across America today?
There
is an often-used phrase that I have always considered a good rule of thumb for businesses that serve
or cater to the public. That phrase goes:
We should look like the people we serve. If this approach is actually applied, it
means that the racial makeup of an entity would not necessarily reflect a national reality, but rather a local reality. In fact, a strong case can be made that in
many instances, the approach might even reflect a global reality. Which
reality should dictate the racial mix of an entity’s staff that delivers the
product? That would be the reality of the area or region served by the
entity.
Would
it be surprising to find an all-hispanic staff in a convenience store that was
located in a community that was largely-inhabited by hispanics? Is it shocking to find that a men’s store or
barber shop in a predominantly-black community is staffed by black personnel? In a basically all-white suburb of an
American city, is it uncommon to find a fast food business staffed by white
personnel? I believe the general answer to these questions is
“no”.
On
the other hand, should a black citizen walk into a government office that
administers government programs to all eligible citizens and find no one in the
place that looks like they do? If they walk in the office, they are clearly a part of the client base served
by the entity. Is it reasonable for a hispanic
citizen to attend a city government open meeting and see not a single hispanic
face in the governing body? In a society
that is 76.3 percent white, what do we think about a National Basketball
Association (NBA) league that features 74.4 percent black players? FWIW…the average
annual salary of an NBA player is 7.7
million dollars; a pretty good job if you can get it. When a parent attends an event at the school
where their children attend, should they see that their racial profile is
represented in the staff at that institution?
In a city that represents tens of thousands of residents, should we not
expect the police force to look like the population it serves and
protects? These are questions that need
to be considered when decisions are made about equality in our nation.
When
the first settlers arrived in America, they were a mix of European
adventurers. They arrived in a land that
was occupied by Native Americans. Over
the decades of history, Canadians have immigrated southward to our country; Hispanics
and South Americans have immigrated north to the United States. Our country has absorbed people from all
across the globe into a society that is a virtual kaleidoscope of race and
ethnicity. Together, this diverse mix
of customs and heritage comprise the America we all know today; they make up one country that represents
them all. While cherishing and
honoring their individual pasts and histories, they are now a part of a larger
whole and have chosen to be citizens of these United States. Even though they rightfully cling to the
experiences that have uniquely made them what they are, they have subjugated
those events to the ideal of a community that can accept them respectfully and
yet demand their allegiance to a larger and broader set of customs and
laws.
The
old saying “America, love it or leave it”
has become politically incorrect and is often used in a harsh and alienating
fashion. But at the heart of these
words, there is an implicit message. By
choosing to live in our country and taking part in the privileges that American
citizenry offers, a person has entered into a contract with others.
Those others are the ones that make up this nation from top to bottom
and side to side. They are white, brown,
black and many other shades of skin color.
They represent many different attitudes, customs, histories, and beliefs
about how they should live and celebrate life.
All citizens expect and demand equality; but to embrace equality is to embrace tolerance. Tolerance demands that we respect the rights
and dignity of others who might look and behave differently than we do. Tolerance requires that we cannot dictate to
others our own customs and beliefs
that might exist at the expense of their customs
and beliefs. Tolerance is a trait that
we cannot rightfully demand receipt of
without genuinely giving it away.
If
a person wants to live in an America that fashions itself according to a pattern
of their personal beliefs, they can
likely find that place somewhere in this country; that is freedom. That place might be a community that consists
of similar races and ethnic customs.
That place might be a city or town that is largely composed of similar
races and ethic customs. That place
might even be a state that predominantly represents certain races and ethnic
customs. But the essential element that must be maintained in this migratory
pattern is the fact that while you and your neighbors might enjoy your individual
lifestyles and customs, there are other Americans out there who think and
behave differently. Tolerance demands
that you understand and participate in the concept of a broad and diverse
country. While celebrating your personal self, you respect the
rights of others to celebrate theirs.
Don’t
miss the next post….Just
Google centerlineright
And
while some might voluntarily choose to live among those who look and behave as
they do; there will be others who can find enjoyment and comfort in a society
that features a spectrum of different attitudes and cultures. Those cities and towns and communities
somehow find a way to blend together a multitude of heritages that ultimately
result in a collective environment of mutual appreciation for the qualities of
each. These groups represent the original
concept of an America that our founders envisioned as a melting pot of the human experience.
Ultimately,
the point is that our nation was created in such a fashion that its inhabitants
might live a life with freedom and dignity in a range of different environments. They
have the inherent right to move around in this country and find a place that suits
their personal inclinations. They even have the right to leave these
United States if they are unable to find a spot where they can live with
contentment and satisfaction. These
opportunities and rights are the principles that make our country unique and
precious. They are the bedrock
foundation upon which our governments, both national and local, should build
and operate upon. Equality driven by tolerance is a concept that must be rediscovered
by our citizens if we are to achieve the true ideals of our founders.
Equality
is a product of equal opportunity that demands accountability and
ambition. Its premise requires that a
participant is willing to contribute
as well as receive. If a person accepts this premise and lives
accordingly, equality can become a reality that exists without fanfare and
bluster. It becomes a normality that
need not be demanded because it is a natural part of being. It fosters a culture of mutual respect and
dignity that obsoletes the need to distinguish between races and
ethnicity. We shouldn’t need to write Hispanic American…or Black American…or White American. We should simply
write hispanic American…or black American…or white American; or even better, let’s just write American.
Tolerance
must be practiced in a broad sense in order to be authentic. Tolerance of those who only agree with the
one tolerating is not tolerance at all.
It is a narrow-minded type of bigotry that illustrates the highest form
of hypocrisy. This practice leads to a
false standard of behavior that is actually anathema to the fundamental concept
of tolerance. The history of man is rife
with the horrific consequences of institutional group-think and indoctrination
that require allegiance to a specific set of attitudes and beliefs. Tolerance can be inconvenient, messy, and
inefficient; but true tolerance demands that the substance of differing
opinions be heard, considered, and represented to some degree when determining
how society exists. Authentic representation is a critical element of equality and
tolerance.
And even more importantly,
once those differing opinions are entertained; the possessors of those
differing opinions should respect and appreciate their opportunity to have been
heard and then willingly defer to the majority disposition. They understand that having enjoyed the
liberty to express their opinions and agendas, they have failed to convince a
sufficient number of others to embrace those ideals. While they may continue to hold those ideals
personally, they nonetheless should accept the will of the majority and
tolerate the reality of the whole. It is
irresponsible, counterproductive, and childish to advocate “burn it all down” if you don’t get your
way. Tolerance freely given should
result in tolerance being received. A
minority does not dictate to the majority.
A minority may demand respect, dignity, and opportunity; but not the
privilege of authority over the whole.