The
media has moved into an almost apoplectic state in their coverage of the House
drama involving Majority Speaker Pelosi and the Squad led by AOC. Pelosi is
learning the lesson that haunted her Republican predecessors; herding cats is
easier than herding two-year-term Napoleons in the U.S. House of
Representatives. Perhaps the defining
moment in this drama has already occurred and passed beneath the radar. I am referring to the coalition of House
Democrats and Republicans that passed the Senate version of the Border Relief
Bill.
Although
it had previously passed a House version that typically would have gone to
conference and been reconciled with the Senate bill, the House instead
succumbed to the rapidly closing window of time to pass the necessary
legislation. They chose to swallow the distasteful
bite rather than choke on the public relations disaster of obstinance. This decision by Pelosi infuriated many of the
more liberal Democrats in the House, generating derisive and critical remarks
about her leadership. Many referred to
it as essentially abject surrender to Senate Majority Leader McConnell and the
Republicans in Congress. In her defense,
Pelosi simply stated that it was an imperfect bill that had to be passed due to
circumstances.
Let’s
look at the bill for just a moment. I
love it when the old gray lady
herself has to cover a Democratic legislative episode that runs counter to its
ultra-liberal agenda; let us examine their approach https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/border-funding-immigration.html
.
As
stated in their article, the vote was 305 to 102 in favor of the bill that was passed
over from the Senate. That vote
reflected that 129 Democrats joined with 176 Republicans…in the HOUSE.
The very House where the Democrats hold a 235 to 197 advantage over the
Republicans (there is 1 Independent and 2
vacancies) and the Democrats routinely spend the bulk of their time investigating
all things Trump. The bill that was approved in this
reluctantly-bipartisan effort had previously passed the Senate by an 84 to 8
margin; an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote.
To complete the picture, remember that the party count in the Senate is 53
Republican, 45 Democrat, and 2 Independents (both of whom caucus with the Democrats). One can argue with the provisions in this
bill and the wisdom of what is in and
what was left out. What was obviously not up for argument was
the critical need for the $4.59 billion piece of legislation to be sent
to the President in order to address the crisis at our southern border. This is the point I would like to
emphasize.
I
have generously heaped criticism and scorn upon Congress over the life of my
blog. The sophomoric and ludicrous
manner in which our legislators often conduct their business is a large and
simple target to shoot at. The House in
particular is a bubbling cauldron of arrogant opinions held by
self-aggrandizing characters who have been elected to two-terms in a House of
435 members by, at most, a handful of counties.
The logistics of the challenges faced by a House Majority leader are so
intimidating that it is a marvel to me why anyone would seek the position. If anything supports the self-affirming quest
for political power and wealth that drives American politicians; the quest for
House Speaker is right at the top of them.
But in this particular instance, as we witness all too rarely, the
Senate and the House responded to a very real need in our government and they
did so in a bipartisan and effective way.
Even though the House completed the process with a gun held to its head,
I celebrate the accomplishment of the deed.
At the end of the day, the process worked and the necessary legislation was
passed. Pelosi made a hard decision; the right decision; and she deserves credit for it.
Don’t
miss the next post!
Follow on Twitter
@centerlineright.
I
was recently working on a building project with my son-in-law and eight-year
old grandson; we are adding a shed addition to a cabin. At some point in the proceedings, the conversation
led to a discussion of my grandson’s behavior and how impressive it could be…on selected occasions. He had been spending a few days with us and
had been on one of those exceptional good
behavior trips. The talk naturally
covered those times when he did not quite behave up to expected standards. I commented to him that he had tipped his
hand when he demonstrated the capacity to behave in a responsible and mature
fashion; demonstrating his clear ability to fulfill that expected role. I tried to express to him that these
impressive episodes only made his moments of infantile actions seem even more
disappointing and undesirable. The point
being that one is expected to be the best person they are capable of being for
most of the time they are living. I
believe this is what we, as citizens, expect of our elected officials. It is what infuriates us when we witness the
partisan bickering that paralyzes the legislative process. It is largely the source of dissatisfaction
with our President’s personal behavior when he lowers himself and his actions
to those of his critics.
I
dare to hope that this moment of accomplishment (not to raise it to a seminal level) will somehow serve to clarify
and crystallize the potential in a poisonously-divided House to actually
perform the duties for which they were elected.
For all of its imperfections and glaring misjudgments, our government can function in a responsible and
substantive manner. Our nation's framers did an ingenious job of designing a resilient system; if we will only adhere to their plan. Even though the explanation
for the passage of this border
legislation lies largely in a rapidly-expiring legislative deadline and the
desperate need to pass something;
perhaps the fact that a few House Democrats peeled off of their strict Party
ideology to join with Republicans in this effort will demonstrate the potential for future legislative
successes. The next time around, it might be a few Senate
Republicans crossing over to join Senate Democrats in the passage of some
legislation. The point is…it is
possible.
If
President Trump can somehow minimize his flamboyant personal behavior, he might
be less involved in the daily fare of
the media talking heads and more
involved in the necessary legislative efforts that are critical to the function of our
nation’s government. If he can somehow
cease fighting fire with fire, his detractors might stop throwing flammable
bombs at him and instead turn their attention towards doing their jobs. As is the case with my grandson, once one has demonstrated the heights to which they might rise, we can reasonably expect
them to perform at that level on a consistent basis.
No comments:
Post a Comment