My
wife showed me a Facebook post about the hubbub surrounding a report that
President Trump had once used Russian dressing on his salad. Obviously meant as satire, this bit of
foolishness cuts far too close to the mainstream media daily themes than is
comfortable. Like most people I know, I
am sick of hearing “Russia this and
Russia that”. After starting out his
Administration with some tough rhetoric about Russia and putting in place some
very tough policies, our President is now sounding very much like his
predecessors who failed miserably with Russian relations. If Trump wishes to have a better ending with
Putin, he best be focusing much more on his actions than on his words.
In
December of 1991, the USSR officially disintegrated and broke up into fifteen
separate countries, including Russia and Ukraine. Vladimir Putin became President of Russia in
2000 and has ruled the nation ever since; occasionally as Prime Minister, but
generally as President. There were nine
Baltic countries resulting from the USSR breakup, all of them having shores on
the Baltic Sea. At the time of the USSR’s
ending, Putin was the reining spymaster for Boris Yeltsin and based on his
remarks and behavior ever since, the disintegration of the USSR has obviously
left a very big bur under his saddle. He
makes very little effort to hide his secret dream of reforming the old USSR by
any means necessary.
Putin
has seized every opportunity to meddle in the affairs of his neighboring countries;
perhaps the most egregious being the takeover of the Crimean peninsula. Russia’s largest naval base is located on
the Black Sea in the Crimean peninsula.
This is the only warm water
naval base that the Russians hold and they view their possession and control of
it as a source of non-negotiable self-defense.
In March of 2014, Putin completed his effort to reclaim the Crimean
peninsula for Russia. Although the
Crimean peninsula was clearly part and parcel of Ukraine, the majority of the
Crimean population spoke Russian. By
fomenting turmoil and mayhem in Crimea through the use of undercover
soldiering, Russia managed to annex
the Crimean peninsula in March of 2014.
A key element in Putin’s restoration scheme was accomplished.
Although
the Russian takeover of Crimea was naked aggression and universally condemned
by free nations, Putin referred to the invasion as “the will of the (Crimean) people”.
Putin saw what he wanted and he took it.
He gambled that the US, NATO, and any other European nation would not stand up forcefully to his
actions. He was right. Putin now has his warm water naval port at
Sevastopol in the palm of his hand and uses it daily to project Russian power
out into the world (i.e. Syria). In 2008, citing the need to protect
citizenry, Russia had used similar tactics and reasoning to essentially annex
regions of Georgia. Russia has
consistently threatened that any NATO alliance with a country that borders them
will be considered a serious offense to their security. They have sufficiently intimidated European
leaders with this rhetoric and it has resulted in the reality of the border
countries fending for themselves in their pursuit of freedom and liberty from
Russia; a perpetual “David and Goliath”
equation.
Putin
is a man, and a leader, who understands strength and action, not rhetoric. He remains hungry to restore the old USSR
union as it was when he was chief spymaster.
He will do anything within his power to soften up and torment the former
USSR states in order to help create future opportunities for annexation. Russia’s covert
war in Ukraine has cost over 10,000 lives and displaced well over 1.5
million people. Putin is determined to
keep Ukraine under his thumb and will
stop at nothing to accomplish that task.
Putin’s power play in Crimea got Russia kicked out the G8 group. Somehow, I don’t believe he has lost much
sleep over that development.
In
my humble and layman opinion, the threat of Russia towards it’s Baltic
neighbors is the largest international threat to America (yes, even bigger than North Korea).
What I find so threatening about the Baltics is that they are right
there in Putin’s face; what was once his domain is now his enemy. Where once he ruled from on high, he is now
held in low esteem. I am convinced that
at some point in the foreseeable future, Putin will attempt to extend Russian influence
into the Baltics just as he has done, and is doing, in Ukraine. It is simply a temptation too ripe to resist.
Trump, America, and NATO cannot allow
this to happen. They need to get their
collective heads out of their arse and show some resolve. Rather than worrying about how many Mercedes Germany
is selling in America, Trump and Merkel better worry about how many tanks they can
put on Russia’s border.
Don’t miss the next post! Follow
on Twitter @centerlineright. If you
enjoy the blog, pass it on to your friends.
In
September of 2009, Obama unilaterally abandoned a long-established joint
venture with Poland and the Czech Republic to place missile defense facilities
in each country. The possibility of an
ABM system in Europe’s eastern doorway rattled Putin badly. Based on the promise of “Russian concessions”, Obama threw our fledgling allies under the
bus and cancelled the agreement. Now in
fairness to Obama, there was quite a bit of sentiment both at home and abroad
to support this action; but it remains a dubious policy initiative at
best. If Trump wants to be tough with the Russians and not just talk tough about the Russians, he will
take steps towards placing these systems in Poland the Czech Republic. This action, if taken, would undoubtedly
provoke Putin and have some adverse international consequences. But reality demonstrates to us that Russia is
doing all it can to make life miserable for America. What
more can they do? Russia understands
power and the simple fact is that as of right now, the US has much more power
than Russia. We need to remind Putin of
this.
Another
bizarre twist in Russian relations is the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline. As Trump stated recently, this arrangement
between Germany and Russia is madness.
How can it possibly make any sense whatsoever for our NATO allies in
Europe to rely on Russia for over forty percent of their natural gas energy
needs? This is not only a bone-headed
position in which to place your nation’s basic security, but it is also a slap
in the face to America’s companies that export natural gas. When it leaves Russia, the Nord Stream
pipeline passes by Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland on its way to
Germany. In the past, Russia has played
hardball with these countries by cutting off their energy supplies to gain
political leverage. Now Russia will be
in a position to do the same with our European NATO allies. Do you think there is a reason why the Nord
Stream line runs right past these nations without a connection en route? Could it be to increase the energy-dependence
leverage on them that Russia already holds?
Duh.
Putin
is a murderously threatening thug of a world leader. He cannot be trusted and will never be
motivated by anything other than self-interest and the restoration of the old
USSR. Every President I can recall seems
to come into the White House thinking that they can somehow charm Putin into
becoming an honest partner in negotiations.
They all end up learning too late that Putin is exactly what history has
shown him to be. President Trump is in
love with the sound of his own voice and apparently thinks he can spring some
of this art of the deal crap on Putin
and use him like a tool. If he continues
to believe this and operates with the same rhetoric he has demonstrated lately,
he will end up in Putin’s tool box like other
past presidents. Trump needs to quit
talking and start doing. And a good
place to start doing is the placement of an ABM/Aegis system in Eastern Europe,
starting with Poland and the Czech Republic.
He needs to make it clear to Germany and any other Russian “Nord Stream” client that it is a yuuuuggggeee
mistake to depend on Russia for energy needs when their good friend and ally (USA anyone?) can supply the same product
without the national security drama.
Russia
is a shell of a threat compared to what they were in the heyday of the
USSR. Their economy is not working;
they are spread thin around the globe in many locations of misadventure; and
with a robust American economy, we can build up our defense structure at a much
faster and more effective rate than Russia.
What Russia can and will do is
provoke our leaders at every opportunity.
They will side against us on the international stage if they perceive
that slight to be harmful. They will
threaten us and they will use proxies to hurt us; but they cannot defeat
us. We need only hold our resolve and
focus on the strong hand we have to play as compared to theirs. Only if we lower ourselves to their playground tactics will we allow them to gain on us in the international
theatre of political will and power. Playing
nice with Putin and hoping he will
change his stripes is not an effective foreign policy. Looking at history, examining his past
behavior, and recognizing him for the ambitious tyrant that he is….that is an effective foreign
policy. I have to wonder…what is Mad Dog
telling the Donald to do with Russia?
We
should never forget that when Putin lies down to sleep at night, he dreams of
reclaiming those fourteen countries that were part of his homeland. He has already taken large chunks from two of
them. President Trump’s decision to
send heavy weaponry to Ukraine for self defense is a step in the right
direction. But the US needs to be much
bolder in its embrace of Russia’s neighbors and their pursuit of independence
and freedom. I do not advocate for an
American presence in these countries; but rather an honest and public show of
support for their rights as free nations.
This is the battle that NATO
should be waging. These nations that
thirst for freedom and are in their infant stages of independence could be, and
should be, NATO’s first line of defense against the reality of Russian
aggression. These heroic nations that
are fighting the Soviet giant do not want our blood; they simply want a
fighting chance to survive. This we can,
and should, do.
No comments:
Post a Comment